Entire ME imploding

[Max E.]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I knew they would uphold it because of the consequences if they didn't

In other words, you knew jack shit about the actual law, but your position was based on speculation/partisanship.

Good to know!

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

In other words, you knew jack shit about the actual law, but your position was based on speculation/partisanship.

Good to know!

He thinks he has "skill".

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

I don't see how that answers the question.

Let's try again.


Explain how you claimed Obamacare is NOT a tax but supposedly KNEW the SC would uphold it, because they consider it - a tax.

I don't think they upheld it because of the reason given nor did I predict what the reason given would be.There were numerous reasons they could have upheld it or struck it down so that was never an issue with me .They also didnt need to mention "consequences" in their decision but you can bet your ass that that was part of the closed door discussions and part of the decision

The difference between me and you is you thought they would make the judgement purely on constitutional grounds,I knew they weren't

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

He thinks he has "skill".

I do,thats why I was here posting and you were away from ET doing whatever it is you do when not at ET

 

[Max E.]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:


The difference between me and you is you thought they would make the judgement purely on constitutional grounds,I knew they weren't

So, are you proud of the fact that they are dismissing the constitutiion?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I don't think they upheld it because of the reason given

Oh..so the SCOTUS just made up that part about it being a tax? Really?

nor did I predict what the reason given would be.

My whole point actually, had you really KNOWN in the absolute sense of the word. You would have also KNOWN why.

...The difference between me and you is you thought they would make the judgement purely on constitutional grounds,I knew they weren't

You mean you GUESSED they wouldn't. Anyway, they were supposed to make a judgement purely on constitutional grounds. It's their fucking job.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Max E. Pad:

So, are you proud of the fact that they are dismissing the constitutiion?

No,but I accept reality

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I do,thats why I was here posting and you were away from ET doing whatever it is you do when not at ET

Again, lucky not skillful. The result is the same.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

Again, lucky not skillful. The result is the same.

Geez. It's obvious why IQ doesn't trade. You can't live in a fantasy world and be a successful trader.

 

[AK Forty Seven]

Quote from Lucrum:

Oh..so the SCOTUS just made up that part about it being a tax? Really?My whole point actually, had you really KNOWN in the absolute sense of the word. You would have also KNOWN why.
You mean you GUESSED they wouldn't. Anyway, they were supposed to make a judgement purely on constitutional grounds. It's their fucking job.

1.They didn't make up the part about being a tax,but they could have used other reasons to uphold it or strike it down

2.I did know why.The reason given why it was upheld is not the real reason it was upheld

3.No ,it wasn't a guess.The SC has been making decisions that are not based on the constitution for a long time