Quote from Squiggle:
Should I stay away from entering iron condors with only 10-14 days left.
I can still find 60% probability trades and make 200%. The strike prices would need to be pretty tight to the current stock price to receive a decent credit.
What are the pros and cons of this strategy?
1) Negative gamma increases as time to expiration decreases. Thus, if underlying runs against you, losses are significantly larger when trading near-term options than further-term options. That's the biggest risk.
I'm not referring to the loss at expiration, but the loss when time remains.
2) Obviously time decay is more rapid for near-term options. That represents your reward for taking the risk of negative gamma.
You must be certain you understand and are willing to live with that risk and reward.
3) I don't know how you calculate your possible profits, but you cannot make 200%.
The cash at risk is the margin requirement, and your profit is not going to be twice that amount. On a 10-point IC, you must collect $6.67, risking only $3.33 to earn 200%. Perhaps you were referring to an annualized return?
4) 60% probability ignores all those times that you close or adjust the trade prior to expiration. That 60% number is either an illusion or you never plan to adjust.
It's your decision. There are pros and cons. I avoid these trades, but I'm more conservative than you are.
Mark
http://blog.mdwoptions.com/