Full on ad hominem......I mean, what else can you do Pabst?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Endnotes in Coulter's latest book rife with distortions and falsehoods
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Endnotes in Coulter's latest book rife with distortions and falsehoods
Coulter is a diversion.
I read this thread and that much is pretty clear. Instead of discussing the releveancy ( or the lack thereof ) of her work to American or western security, the whole thread degenerates into a name calling contest.
Proof that shes a very good diversonary element, and she gets paid accordingly.
Why even bother with the name calling?! Both sides should just stick to and memorize your Baaaaaahhhhhhs. Because that's all you are really, Disposable mindless sheep following the script.
And while you dumb fucks are trying to measure your dick size:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060807/ap_on_hi_te/aol_search_privacy
NEW YORK - AOL released the Internet search terms that more than 650,000 of its subscribers entered over a three-month period and admitted Monday that what it originally intended as a gesture to researchers amounted to a privacy breach and a mistake. ADVERTISEMENT
Although AOL had substituted numeric IDs for the subscribers' real user names, the company acknowledged the search queries themselves may contain personally identifiable data.
For example, many users type their names to find out whether sites have dirt on them and then separately search for online mentions of their phone, credit card or
Social Security numbers. A few days later, they may search for pizzerias in their neighborhoods, revealing their locations, or for prescription drug prices, revealing their medical conditions. All those separate searches would be linked to the same numeric ID.
"Search query data can contain the sum total of our work, interests, associations, desires, dreams, fantasies and even darkest fears," said Lauren Weinstein, a privacy advocate.
The company apologized for the disclosure.
"This was a screw up, and we're angry and upset about it," AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein said. "It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools, but it was obviously not appropriately vetted, and if it had been, it would have been stopped in an instant."
He could not say whether anyone has been disciplined, saying an internal investigation was continuing.
The disclosure comes as the Time Warner Inc. unit tries to increase usage of its search services and other free, ad-supported features to offset a decline in subscriptions, a drop likely to accelerate with its recent decision to give away AOL.com e-mail accounts and software.
Yeah, like these Time Warner bitches really give a shit. The only reason they came forward with this news is because some insider threatened to go public.
Now back to your Baaaaahhhhhhhhs Sheeple.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060807/ap_on_hi_te/aol_search_privacy
NEW YORK - AOL released the Internet search terms that more than 650,000 of its subscribers entered over a three-month period and admitted Monday that what it originally intended as a gesture to researchers amounted to a privacy breach and a mistake. ADVERTISEMENT
Although AOL had substituted numeric IDs for the subscribers' real user names, the company acknowledged the search queries themselves may contain personally identifiable data.
For example, many users type their names to find out whether sites have dirt on them and then separately search for online mentions of their phone, credit card or
Social Security numbers. A few days later, they may search for pizzerias in their neighborhoods, revealing their locations, or for prescription drug prices, revealing their medical conditions. All those separate searches would be linked to the same numeric ID.
"Search query data can contain the sum total of our work, interests, associations, desires, dreams, fantasies and even darkest fears," said Lauren Weinstein, a privacy advocate.
The company apologized for the disclosure.
"This was a screw up, and we're angry and upset about it," AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein said. "It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools, but it was obviously not appropriately vetted, and if it had been, it would have been stopped in an instant."
He could not say whether anyone has been disciplined, saying an internal investigation was continuing.
The disclosure comes as the Time Warner Inc. unit tries to increase usage of its search services and other free, ad-supported features to offset a decline in subscriptions, a drop likely to accelerate with its recent decision to give away AOL.com e-mail accounts and software.
Yeah, like these Time Warner bitches really give a shit. The only reason they came forward with this news is because some insider threatened to go public.
Now back to your Baaaaahhhhhhhhs Sheeple.
LOL, lonelyalcoholicseniletroll gets his hypocrisy pushed back in his pathetic only-his-mother-could-love-face yet again....Quote from Pabst:
You profess to being environmentally-friendly yet your waste of electricity, bandwidth and time displays a woefully shameful lack of resource restraint. It's really pathetic.
Ann's paid a rappers-sum for her work. You tirelessly whore yourself out on ET for free.........
Do your posts contain less exaggeration, distortion or stupidity than Coulter's work?