End of Covid Scam soon

Tsing Tao said:
I just find it funny that you attack the source when you don't like the message, but then you use random sources that aren't mainstream when you like the message.

Then you use mediabiasfactcheck to piss on sources other people post when they are labeled as "mixed" for factual reporting, then you turn around and regularly use rawstory.com which is - yep, you guessed it, labeled as mixed for factual reporting at the very same site.

You're a clown. You'd be better off just not saying anything, but as I said - you can't help yourself. Clown's gotta clown.
More...

I use Raw Story for one of two things:
  • First is to provide a summary of an article which is behind a Firewall such as the New York Times. This allows an overview to be provided and Raw Story provides a link in the article to the original source for those who are interested.
  • Second is to use the information as an opinion piece -- usually in the context of a thread to provide more color. Or possibly to simply mock idiotic politicians.
 
gwb-trading said:
I use Raw Story for one of two things:
  • First is to provide a summary of an article which is behind a Firewall such as the New York Times. This allows an overview to be provided and Raw Story provides a link in the article to the original source for those who are interested.
  • Second is to use the information as an opinion piece -- usually in the context of a thread to provide more color. Or possibly to simply mock idiotic politicians.
More...

Yeah, it doesn't really make a shit of difference why you use it. The fact that you use it is all that matters - particularly because it is rated so poorly from a site you yourself used to dismiss other sources. Had you never gone off with the whole mediabiasfact check site, I'd never even have had this to point out. But you gotta be you.

Like I said. Clown.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
STFU.
More...
NO meme.jpeg
 
Ricter said:
What percent of those, compared to the petri dishes I mean unvaxxed, went to ICUs though?
More...

C'mon they are not "petri dishes" -- the unvaccinated are the "control group".

A control group who are over twice as likely to be re-infected - over 5 times in the most recent studies. The unvaccinated are over 5 times as likely to get Omicron, more than 17 times likely to be hospitalized (more than 48 times for older adults), and over 97 times as likely to die.
 
Buy1Sell2 said:
There is no such thing as re-infection. Thank you for your time.
More...

Your claims are laughable when large scale data sets from governments such as the U.K. which carefully document Covid information show a significant number of proven re-infections.

You really should stop continuously pushing complete disinformation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top