one way to test L5 without intraday data is to enter at the entry price calculated from L5, but always exits at the daily close price, assuming the cut loss and cut win cancel each other for long term. the backtest in this way should produce positive gains if there is indeed an winning bias on the entry price based on L5.
I doubt if the entry price does not have winning bias, this L5 approach would be a winning strategy.
I doubt if the entry price does not have winning bias, this L5 approach would be a winning strategy.
Quote from hayman:
This system has not been backtested properly. Long-term backtesting cannot be accomplished with daily values, stated fluctations of intraday of L5 cannot be happening, clean data and proper OHLC values from a reliable datasource are required, proper money management rules need to be assumed and applied, and the list goes on.
I've come up with a reasonable, but not exact, facsimile of L5, and testing under 2 years' worth of 1-min bars for the 5 stocks results in an overall loss of close to 10 %.
If EminTrader wants to prove me wrong on this, he can either:
1) Supply me with L5 formula, which I will apply to my
backtesting algorithm....I will supply WL code to verify
that we are on the same page with algorithm;
2) I can furnish EminTrader with 1 min data for the 5 stocks,
for 2 years (sorry, that's all I have), and he can migrate his
algorithm to a real backtesting platform (WL, Tradestation,
etc.), and generate results for himself.
Other than that, way too many holes, assumptions, and mistakes to make this thread of value any more. It has been a fun exercise to test though.
