Quote from alexandert:
However, most of your trades go against LBR's Holly Grail setup
when they approach MA 20.
LBR always teach that when ADX > 30, exponential MA 20 becomes a support/resistance even if ADX drops a little (exp to 28).
I did not find Holly Grail setup useful for an entry. But it does provide a support quite often. Exp yesterday.
By viewing some of the past signals (need to make historical tests to prove it) I came to conclusion that it might make sense to exit a half or all your position at the MA instead of the KC bottom/top.
especially in a strongly trading markets.
Ofcourse your profit/loss ratio will drop substantially but having fewer losses will compensate for it and make your trading
more fun. Exp yesterday.
Regards.
Alex T.
Quote from jabbar11:
How many trades per month does your method generate ?
Quote from no_pm_please:
Linda teaches that an ADX > 30 indicates a strong trend. When there is a strong trend, she believes the 20 period MA acts as a support point.
I believe adx > 30 could be evidence of a strong trend or evidence of a aging weak trend. I use divergence with volume and overextension of momentum to indicate when the trend is weak. She doesn't go that far in her teaching. When there is a strong trend then the 20 period MA is a good support point. When there isn't a strong trend, then it has no value.
Yesterday I didn't see the price bounce at the 20 period MA. The original move blew right through it and was close to the target exit point.
Quote from jabbar11:
How do you determine if a day is starting to become a trend day so you can stand aside ? This is when the system will lose, correct ?
Quote from dbphoenix:
Any "setup", particularly one that virtually everyone knows about, requires periodic re-examination to determine whether or not it is still valid. Unfortunately, gurus seem as likely as anyone else to overlook this fact.
Experienced traders know that in a strong trend just about anything "works". However, strong trends have been few and far between during the last year, at least, and if this re-examination doesn't take place, one can bang his head against the market until his account is seriously damaged.
Quote from jabbar11:
The reason I ask is if he is doing 10 emini, today he would have sold short at 99050 and covered at 98375 he would have made $3375. He metioned in a previous post that they pay for a musician stinks. I want you to make economic sense out of this. Please show me how working is necessary to pay income taxes. I don't get it.
jabbar11
Quote from Pabst:
On 3/14 all the major indicies made an upward penetration of their 34day SMA. It took 4 months for a subsequent close below the 34day. From mid Mch-mid June the indicies were up 30%. I'd say thats a very nice trend! In fact for any one who cares look at both a daily 34SMA and a 21 day EMA over the past year. With the exception of last years Holiday season and this Summer, the market has had a series of very tradeable trends.