Elon at court

1. We simply don't know if there are savings. If the getting ready for reuse costs almost as much as a new rocket, they might as well use a new one. Not to mention we will only know how many times they can be reused when they finally fail. Now had they already reused any of their rockets 10+ times, I would say, sure, it is proven. So far the most was reused only once iirc.

2. I agree that EVs have not got enough energy density. But if so, they shouldn't make silly claims. You can't beat the law of physics. Maybe sometimes in the future.

3. Boring hasn't bored anything useful so far. They have some contracts to bore, but we shall see what comes out of them.


I think in the last 18months, 1 Stage has been used 10times so tick!!

Boring, has proven to be very boring,why Elon Called it Boring obvs.

EV's, they need to do small 2 seater city range models, which would suite most 2 car house holds, cheap and huge amount of power to charge, then normal car for longer stuff.

Or just legalise Electric Skooters we can all zip around on those fast enough around the towns and £400 much cheaper than a car and much less power.
 
Let's see what the outcome of this drama would be.

"My favorite part off the suit is that if they get a judgement against Musk, Tesla gets the money.
I personally don't even get how shareholders can even bring a suit where they stand to gain nothing against the wishes of the company who ultimately is the one who would be paid any winnings.

If he pays tesla, he can turn around and get a salary or other compensation to get the money back.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/12/elo...older-lawsuit-over-solarcity-acquisition.html

If Musk loses, he could have to pay upwards of $2 billion. However, in this case, known as a shareholder derivative action, the suit is filed by investors on behalf of a corporation, rather than the individuals or funds. If the plaintiffs win, proceeds may go to Tesla and not to the stakeholders who brought the suit."
 
Back
Top