"seem" "wavy" "subjective" "hard to prove" etc. etc.
This could also be said of reading chicken entrails or tea leaves. So many believe in their witch doctors. They usually put on a very good show that entrances the believers...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Elliott wave does work
- Thread starter commoditiestrdr
- Start date
"seem" "wavy" "subjective" "hard to prove" etc. etc.
This could also be said of reading chicken entrails or tea leaves. So many believe in their witch doctors. They usually put on a very good show that entrances the believers...
Like anything else that's for sale, its tough to find verifiable track records for EW calls.
Glen Neely has a service, you could subscribe for a while & see if it offers an edge. I get the impression he doesn't mix in a whole lot of other stuff with it, but I don't know what his River method entails...
There's some track record info in Timer Digest occasionally (lets you see how the so-called experts do with the methodology). Google:
"timer digest" elliott wave filetype : pdf
Eliminate the spaces on either side of the colon. If I do so in the post, ET shows a smiley.
The filetype : pdf thing will get you old issues of Timer Digest that are on the net, but if you remove it from the search there's more info in html pages.
Finding a workable method is like finding the right golf club for your game - there's no one correct answer for all, and some that suck for you are great for others.
smitty
Glen Neely has a service, you could subscribe for a while & see if it offers an edge. I get the impression he doesn't mix in a whole lot of other stuff with it, but I don't know what his River method entails...
There's some track record info in Timer Digest occasionally (lets you see how the so-called experts do with the methodology). Google:
"timer digest" elliott wave filetype : pdf
Eliminate the spaces on either side of the colon. If I do so in the post, ET shows a smiley.
The filetype : pdf thing will get you old issues of Timer Digest that are on the net, but if you remove it from the search there's more info in html pages.
Finding a workable method is like finding the right golf club for your game - there's no one correct answer for all, and some that suck for you are great for others.
smitty
Quote from rcanfiel:
Quote from commoditiestrdr:
What's your problem with Elliott wave....I've used it and did well with it. It's not the only thing I use and no you can't use just elliott you have to use other indicators in addition to it.
Stop ASSERTING it works. PROVE it. No one else really has. That is why these unproven claims are so annoying. And frankly, if it has outperformance capability, it can stand on its own 2 feet.
HERE IS ONE WAY TO PROVE IT (both the following sites allow discretionary trading - futurestruth and strategyrunner do not):
If trading a lot of different instruments: http://collective2.com/cgi-perl/session.mpl?session=1&displaypage=offer_start.sessionhtml
OR
If just trading indexes and $95 is too much: http://www.timertrac.com/Public/Timers.asp
Get back to us after 4-6 months with your INDEPENDENTLY MONITORED results
Otherwise, Get Lost
You need to get back on your meds. Why does anyone have to prove anything to you? What makes you so special that you can make demands that others give or do something for you? Just because you have posted over 2,200 times on ET does not mean you are anything special.
Quote from jhithers:
You need to get back on your meds. Why does anyone have to prove anything to you? What makes you so special that you can make demands that others give or do something for you? Just because you have posted over 2,200 times on ET does not mean you are anything special.
So, you think that something that remains in the belief space (asserted but unproven) is better than traders actually being able to rely on something. I don't really think you understand the gist of this thread. Apparently you remain in the 95% loser category...
Don't let the door hit you and your 63 posts on the way out...
Quote from TraderZones:
So, you think that something that remains in the belief space (asserted but unproven) is better than traders actually being able to rely on something. I don't really think you understand the gist of this thread. Apparently you remain in the 95% loser category...
Don't let the door hit you and your 63 posts on the way out...
Wow, you really put me in my place.
Quote from jhithers:
Wow, you really put me in my place.
Didn't mean to overload your little mental circuits.
Sorry, but it is hard to put you any lower than you already are. You believe in fairies and Santa Claus, and do not understand nor grasp why something should be proven before risking money. This is a strong sign of a newbie trader, so there is little hope for going any further with "you"
As your head is filled with hot sand, about all you can do is tip it and let the sand run to the other side.
Not worth bothering with the feeble minded, so you are invited to join my ignore list.