Elliott Spitzer To Teach Ethics?

[cstfx]

Quote from Ricter:

Of course, "Obama lapdogs" is your counterpunch that also contributes to derailing this thread.

I'm just trying to "balance" the insult, as it were.

 

[Misthos]

What does sex between two consenting adults have to do with Business ethics?

How does that make Spitzer less of an authority on business ethics?

Are people here anti-sex?

 

[TGregg]

Quote from Lucrum:

He's not teaching, it's just a speaking engagement.
Still ridiculous of course, apparently the standard for speaking at Harvard is nonexistent.

"Spitzer has been invited by the university to speak today."


Maybe you should try reading instead of playing Dungeons and dragons so much.

LOL.

BIG Ownage.

LOL.

 

[IShopAtPublix]

Quote from TGregg:

LOL.

BIG Ownage.

LOL.

Yay a low brow moderator joins the fray. The word teaching when used as a verb is not constrained by time limits. You can be taught something in 1 minute or in 4 years, the time frame is irrelevant. When Elliott Spitzer is going to be giving that speech he may be teaching by example ("this is not what to do...")

Lucrum when he is out of ideas (which is all the time) resorts to sophomoric humor and juvenile attacks. It does not affect me one bit.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Awwww, come on...

The moderator in question isn't a lowbrow...

He is a pin head with no forehead, so the brow just looks low...



Typical pin head moderator type below:




<img src=http://www.davidduke.com/images/Manuel-Garrido.jpg>

Quote from IShopAtPublix:

Yay a low brow moderator joins the fray. The word teaching when used as a verb is not constrained by time limits. You can be taught something in 1 minute or in 4 years, the time frame is irrelevant. When Elliott Spitzer is going to be giving that speech he may be teaching by example ("this is not what to do...")

Lucrum when he is out of ideas (which is all the time) resorts to sophomoric humor and juvenile attacks. It does not affect me one bit.

 

[TraderZones]

Quote from daytrader117:

I believe the courts ruled that you can't profit from crimes, including books (speaking fees?).....

dunno about that. There is a semi longrunning show (name cannot remember), where 2 guys will arrange with a family to test the security of the home. Upon agreement, they ransack the home for valuables, then come and show the family how easy it was to get in, show them how to secure the house, and then when one of them returns to ransack the house, you see he cannot breach the new security features.

They are both past, acknowledged-on-the-show criminals. That is why they are the hosts. And I doubt they work for free on the show...

 

[The Bishop]

Quote from daytrader117:

It would be interesting to hear him anyway. He did say he HAD ethics, just that he would speak on them.

Good job, if you can get it. Although, I hope he's speaking for free. I believe the courts ruled that you can't profit from crimes, including books (speaking fees?).....

"
What you refer to, I believe, was the "Son of Sam laws in that a person convicted of a crime could not benefit commercially from that crime and if there was any benefit it would be awarded to the victims/victims families. I also believe it was something that had to be classified as a violent crime, i.e. rape, murder, assault, etc.

In this case, Spitzer was not indicted or convicted of any crime, so this would not even apply.