Elizabeth Warren on a Roll!

Except that Warren isn't going after the Republicans in this article, she's going after the bankers and the Fed. Does that make Warren wrong? Are you saying she should not going after Wall Street, and instead go after Republicans?

Oh, and I forgot, you're not a liberal or democrat, right? :)

Warren:
“Today I am coming to the floor not to talk about Democrats or Republicans,” Warren began her speech,"
I am a liberal of course. All true libertarians are liberals by definition!. One has to pay attention to nuance. Warren is reacting to the situation as it currently is. I would like to see her start advocating for Repeal of McCarran. That is the best way to address the problem of swaps trading and several other problems as well.
 
swaps trading! Now you nailed it. That's what's wrong with America. Too many goddamn swaps being traded. You can hardly get up in the morning and get a cup of coffee without somebody trading a swap on you. You kids today don't even remember what it was like before McCarran. Kids went to public schools and private doctors, all totally swap free. Ah, those were the days.
 
Show the statistics (as is so simple to do when discussing blacks and crime, etc), and maybe we can come to an agreement.
Would it matter? Consider self-fulfilling probabilities (I'm morphing the old prophecies bit). If a society consistently views one type of person in even a slightly negative way, over time is it not likely that the view will be internalized by that type, have a negative effect on their attitude, on their performance, and even be passed on to their children? Will that not in turn reinforce the initial negative view held by greater society? Thus, the statistics are visible but the process is ignored.

This isn't just speculation, recall the "blue eyed, brown eyed" classroom experiments.
 
Would it matter? Consider self-fulfilling probabilities (I'm morphing the old prophecies bit). If a society consistently views one type of person in even a slightly negative way, over time is it not likely that the view will be internalized by that type, have a negative effect on their attitude, on their performance, and even be passed on to their children? Will that not in turn reinforce the initial negative view held by greater society? Thus, the statistics are visible but the process is ignored.

This isn't just speculation, recall the "blue eyed, brown eyed" classroom experiments.

Wait a second, are you suggesting that more blacks commit crimes because people have a belief that statistics show blacks commit more crimes than any other race?
 
LOL...no they're not. Not unless you're using a different definition of "Liberal" than what is used today.
we are liberal when it comes to you and your life, as long as it doesn't cost me too much. We are extremely conservative when the government wants to get liberal, because that ALWAYS costs me money.
 
we are liberal when it comes to you and your life, as long as it doesn't cost me too much. We are extremely conservative when the government wants to get liberal, because that ALWAYS costs me money.

No argument here.
 
Wait a second, are you suggesting that more blacks commit crimes because people have a belief that statistics show blacks commit more crimes than any other race?
Are you suggesting that "blacks" commit more crime per capita because they have more melanin in their skin? If you are not, what is left besides cultural, socioeconomic factors?
 
Are you suggesting that "blacks" commit more crime per capita because they have more melanin in their skin? If you are not, what is left besides cultural, socioeconomic factors?
it's majority vs minority
 
Back
Top