Quote from ElectricSavant:
dw,
Wouldn't the "Buy" (in units) formula need to read the cell, that the user fills in, for the decimal calculation? instead of 0.01? same for the "Sell" (in units)
Michael B.
Quote from Davidwillis:
ElectricSavant,
Yes, that is what I ment to do, but I messed up on one or more of them( I was in a rush at the time). Your work is getting interesting, think we may be onto something here. Now we need to do some number crunching and see what the best time frame, # of targes, grid space, ect.
David
Quote from ElectricSavant:
I am going to step out on a limb here. This is not an exact science, but I believe an inference can be drawn here.
After looking at these long and short dwstarts:
PAIR..........1Y..........................5Y
AUD/JPY... 50 units-100/350..... 25 units-100/650
AUD/USD.. 50 units-150/300..... 25 units-100/650
CHF/JPY... 50 units-300/150..... 25 units-75/675
EUR/AUD... 50 units-400/50...... 25 units-475/275
EUR/CHF... 50 units-100/350..... 25 units-200/550
EUR/GBP... 50 units-150/250..... 25 units-175/575
EUR/JPY... 50 units-250/250..... 25 units-75/675
EUR/USD... 50 units-300/150.... 25 units-125/625
GBP/CHF... 50 units-200/250.... 25 units-325/425
GBP/JPY... 50 units-250/200..... 25 units-100/650
GBP/USD... 50 units- 300/150.... 25 units-150/600
NZD/USD... 50 units-100/350.... 25 units-75/700
USD/CAD... 50 units-250/200.... 25 units-600/150
USD/CHF... 50 units- 150/300.... 25 units-650/100
USD/JPY.... 50 units-200/250.....25 units-625/125
Could it be said that if starting with the one year dwstart, if the pool is breached then the trader should halv the trade size while outside the pool on a breach, and resume when trading inside the pool?
Michael B.
P.S. Finer tuning can take place by integrating 2, 3, and 4y histories into the mix...but my intuition says its not needed as these are just generalities.
