dw,
After thinking about this, I cannot use the "Quick Start" method of initial entry, because of the half, normal and double trade size that 'would have" been a factor in the build up.
but....
For those traders that prefer fixed unit size entry and maintenece, I have left the cells intact on the spreadsheet. (tip: You can later switch to optimized trend entry at
"mid or median-grid" as the EUR/USD demonstrates currently).
So....
I can use the
"dw Quick Start" on the EUR/USD..but the other pairs must be evaluated..
also....
Support and Resistance is not null and void and after all, Support and Resistance is based on previous prices and works well. So yes, I think previous range is valid and this new concept of trade size will capitalize on Trend Direction and Support and Resistance, because of the way to evaluate "Longer Trend" and "Fast Trend"
(stay tuned)
Being that the broker I use, allows "one-unit size increments" the capitalization does not matter. Since I am a
"yield trader", size would not matter other than the fixed labor costs expended. I will be using the
"faure time interval" entry method, so intraday labor has been eliminated. When the trend is choppy, normal trade size will be used (not half and not double). Early exits that are near the current
"increment finder" target will be taken at the
"faure time interval" which for me is around 17:00 est. after interest is posted on the platform.
(More work completed along with the introduction of normal trade size, See attached spreadsheet)
Michael B.
The martingale will be based with realized yield on balance and step up with a formula that I do not know yet. But being that a fixed unit size is used that is half, normal or double, the calculation will be a traditional method, such as a percent of equity.
Quote from Davidwillis:
Interesting....
Are you thinking about using this trend analysis to determine the initial start as well? So if you started now you would have twice the number of short positions as you would long?