You're mistaken. Or maybe you care to take a stab at what risk is to clarify matters beyond semantics.Another discussion that's really only about semantics.
You're mistaken. Or maybe you care to take a stab at what risk is to clarify matters beyond semantics.Another discussion that's really only about semantics.
Sure. Why not?You're mistaken. Or maybe you care to take a stab at what risk is to clarify matters beyond semantics.
Success is executing the trade according to plan, which over time leads to being profitable over the months and years rather than using something like an arbitrary R/R ratio.
But I think you and me have different trade horizons? Or maybe you just invest?
When I say I track my trades and weight them to have a gauge of whether my next trade(s) might work out, I'm not talking about trades from 6 months ago. I daytrade. Numbers add up pretty quickly. Also I weight my trades in the same sense of how a weighted average weighs more recent data (trades) greater than earlier data. Trying to stay abreast of what the market is doing .... now.
And like I previously said to L&S I asked you what is risk. If was asking for a standard one size fits all version which happens to be wrong anyway I already knew where and how to find it.Sure. Why not?
What I find a lot of times is that people start debating terms that can mean different things to different people. Rarely is a thread, or a topic within a thread, started with a definition--to insure everyone is talking about the same thing.
To answer your question, I'll look to a standard definition. From Investopedia:
Of course I use stops - all the time - every time - set in advance - only moved/adjusted in my favor. Always allowed to do their work. Always.but your plan has a stop loss or expected loss if you are wrong, Right? If so, That’s your risk.
your plan must have some modicum of an idea as to what you could earn, right? That would be your expected return.
You might use different terms but I would be surprised that a long term successful trader as yourself doesn’t have a risk management methodology that’s too far different in concept than other long term successful traders.
Of course I use stops - all the time - every time - set in advance - only moved/adjusted in my favor. Always allowed to do their work. Always.
They protect me from having a bigger loss than my parameters allow or of allowing too much current profit slip away. The risk of either happening. Not the risk of losing a certain amount of dollars.
At one time I found it hard to grasp this key concept and thought of it as just word play. It is not - for me at least.
I believe I understand what you're saying; but just to be clear, you must necessarily disagree with the industry standard definition of the word 'risk;' as I previously quoted.And like I previously said to L&S I asked you what is risk. If was asking for a standard one size fits all version which happens to be wrong anyway I already knew where and how to find it.
Example to clarify risk.
Skydiving is considered "risky" depending on the person. Most would think the risk is of dying. No that is the possible end result. The risk is the chute not opening properly or maybe the plane crashing, pilot having a heart attack or some other odd mishap. That is the risk.
Similarly with trading the risk in a trade is not losing money, even if that is the eventual outcome. Risk is the trade going against you, or a black swan event showing up, or gaping above/below your stop, or internet broker connection going down and cellphone service at the same time, etc.
So Risk = X which causes Y but that doesn't mean Risk = Y if you now know what I mean.
If not difference of opinion notwithstanding Investonewbie