Want to avoid getting suspended or banned on Twitter then don't violate Twitter's terms of service by re-tweeting shiat from Trump.
Elise Stefanik - Man of the Year 2020
- Thread starter TreeFrogTrader
- Start date
Want to avoid getting suspended or banned on Twitter then don't violate Twitter's terms of service by re-tweeting shiat from Trump.
Want to avoid getting suspended or banned on Twitter then don't violate Twitter's terms of service by re-tweeting shiat from Trump.
Heh, GWBaghdad Bob, explaining to us how it works.
Trying to earn his extra potato for the month in his rations.
Mr. Understanding over here. I’d say she’s a good candidate for future account suspension. So what?
Twitter and your ilk want to be treated as private companies that can make decisions as they see fit.
Then out of the other corner of their mouth- especially now that they are up to their arse in lawsuits- they want to argue that they are just free speech promoters and are not responsible for content. Classic example will be all the lawsuits from parents whose kids were trafficked or porn pictures of them kept on twitter despite countless pleas and efforts to have them removed. That just being an example- thousands more lawsuits like that stacking up.
You say "so what".
I say "more to come." Fuckers can't have it both ways.
You like them and the Fakebook crowd too because they are lefties. You have no interest in free speech or fairness or anything along that line. You just rise up in a kneejerk manner to protect whatever the party message or script is. That's all.
Looks like the Bernie Bros will be all upset...
on the other hand this will certainly nail the lid of Liz's GOP political career shut.
on the other hand this will certainly nail the lid of Liz's GOP political career shut.
As i said yesterday or some day, it is amazing how much outpouring of love and respect there is for Liz Cheney from the dems this week.
Yeh. Feel the love.
They are angry I guess because the republicans are proposing to remove a woman and replace her with an old white guy ......that old white guy being Elise Stefanik.
Things have not always been so groovy between Liz and Bernie, but I am glad to see that Bernie is there for her now. That's sweet.
- Cheney called Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, a "commie, who honeymooned in Soviet Union" and suggested he has "daddy issues" with "my daddy."
- Sanders first insulted the Cheneys after Liz attacked his fellow presidential candidate, Senator Elizabeth Warren, on Twitter on Wednesday, asking her "which American cities and how many American citizens are you willing to sacrifice with your policy of forcing the US to absorb a nuclear attack before we can strike back?"
I have a great interest in free speech. Get a permit for a public space and have at it. Publish and use the mail, no problem. Fuck man you can even call people directly or sky write whatever. Take your Trump boats up and down the waterways.
Just remember what isn’t public property or you don’t own is not your property. Get it? You have no say at all. Go mind your business because Twitter is not yours or the public’s.
As to social media companies enabling crimes. Prosecute that shit and make them pay.
A lot of times people get confused anti discrimination laws and free speech rights. The two are not the same and do apply the same way at all.
You seem to think that if I don't approve of a medias behavior that I somehow do not understand that they have the right to do what they are doing- in many instancces anyway. That's bullshiite. Acknowledging their legal right to do something is not a barrier to my criticizing them in return. Perhaps you are not familiar with how free speech works.
These lefty social media and MSDNC sites are shills for the lefty agenda and my criticizing them and underscoring what their agenda is does not require a legal explanation about free speech- instead requires you to understand that I have that right as well, along with Trump supporters.
Having said that. They got legal problems and I am happy to have them have legal problems. The fact that you are okay with the free speech part and the part about suing the shiite out of them for certain content does not mean they are. It is easier for you as an observer than it is for them out on the playing field. They want to be treated as editorial decider private company where it helps them but do not want to be saddled as anything other than a neutral information carrier when they are sued. NOT WORKING OUT FOR THEM. NOOSE GETTING TIGHTER FOR TRUMPSTERS BUT GETTING TIGHTER FOR THEM TOO. Worse yet, they are facing proposed legislation and opening of liability that seems to have bipartisan support.
Anyway, you earned your extra potato by following the required script. And that is what counts.
