Depends on how I improve the fork. Most forks are usually an IMPROVEMENT on your obsolete Bitcoin, but that is not the point. Imagine I could make diamonds at WILL with my 3D printer or microwave. Would you call diamonds rare then? (they are not rare anyway, so you can use anything in this example)
But because of the easiness of forking, you can't claim uniqueness or rarity. For the original purpose of bitcoin (decentralized money) any forked crypto will just do FINE. The only reason crypto fans I mean investors are sticking to BTC is because that is their chosen ponzi.
Hell the first fork Litecoin was an immediate improvement on a bad idea and took I think an hour to create.
So let's end this silly argument because I have to microwave some diamonds. Now be a good boy, and buy some cobalt futures.![]()
Your perpetual arguments discount the BTC network; block scarcity and settlement finality of being included in it's network. There is no other L1 that has achieved what BTC has. No other fork in the past has or fork in the future can. The economic throughput dwarfs even ETH, it's closest competitor.
At the heart of BTC is it's social consensus and status signaling. It's the only network where VC's weren't the first to the party.
