Election 2024

[TrailerParkTed]

But if it wasn’t against the law to own a personal nuclear device would that make it okay? Would you be for it? Or might you wish that the law be changed to disallow it?

You think I might get pulled over? There’s one locally for $150,000 OBO.

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/restored-vietnam-era-military-tank-selling-for-85k-on-facebook.amp

 

[Frederick Foresight]

That would be a reckless law

Perhaps not unlike the current and loose interpretation of the 2nd Amendment?

 

[Overnight]

You think I might get pulled over? ...

They can certainly try. Doubt a PIT maneuver would work very well on you.

 

[Mercor]

No they are not, so long as you have the proper permit from the BATFE.

Yes, you are correct
I made a bad analogy
To make it simple:
I think the Supreme court has done a pretty good job limiting individual rights for weapons

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I think the Supreme court has done a pretty good job limiting individual rights for weapons

As evidenced by the daily mass shootings, no doubt.

There have been more mass shootings in the US than days in 2023.

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/mass-shootings-days-2023-database-shows/story?id=96609874

 

[exGOPer]

Yes they have rights.
The official Government of Gaza is responsible that they don't break laws of warfare by reasonable protecting the citizens.
For example thy could have brought all the children into the tunnels or ask the UN to help move them south or not shot missiles from their grade schools playgrounds

Civilians are protected against direct attack unless, and for such time, as they directly participate in hostilities. Parties to an armed conflict must take all feasible precautions in determining whether a person is a civilian and, if that is the case, whether he or she is directly participating in hostilities

That's a long ass way of saying that it's ok to bomb refugee camps full of children because UN is incompetent in moving hundreds and thousands of people in a small space.

Thanks for clarifying your hypocrisy.

 

[Mercor]

That's a long ass way of saying that it's ok to bomb refugee camps full of children because UN is incompetent in moving hundreds and thousands of people in a small space.

Thanks for clarifying your hypocrisy.

You are using the word refguee camp very loosely. After 75 years ( 3 generations) its time to call it home and start to build a community. Its sad that after 75 years they still depend on Israel to for resources. They attacked Israel in 1948 and lost. They need to take the loss

Refugee camps in Gaza were initially established to temporarily house hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who lost their homes and livelihoods during the Arab-Israeli war in 1948. Nearly 75 years later, they are home to many of the territory's 1.7 million refugees; they rely on humanitarian aid to survive.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

 

[Cuddles]

say what you will about hill-dawg; her batting average is major league:

she said being "groomed", I didn't hear her being called a Russian "asset" in the podcast...those choice words were saved for Stein. Could mean there's intermediaries she's unaware of. I'll trust Hill-dawg has her source being ex-dept State head and all; maybe compelled to produce some proof as the righties run with this cat fight.

Tulsi is a Russian asset and so is Trump. Jill Stein too and Rudy Giuliani.

 

[Tony Stark]

say what you will about hill-dawg; her batting average is major league:





View attachment 327200

West is so fucking erratic she has a chance to get my and the anti Biden progressive vote.