Election 2024

[Mercor]

I didn't ask you for a speech.

You could have simply said that the mass murder of children should stop.

There is no need to go all lawyer on us when the issue is black and white.

Hamas is a terrorist organization, are you equating it to Israel and it's actions? What is the difference between them then?

Its very simple
There is no serious International law of war that Israel is being questioned on...
Before they attack drop pamphlets, make phone calls, send texts and email warning the citizens where they are bombing and what time...
Hamas does not, They put live babies in ovens

 

[Mercor]

You answered a question I didn't ask. But, yes, you answered very clearly that question which I didn't ask.

Your reply is frivolous. You are logically cornered
You need to move on

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Your reply is frivolous. You are logically cornered
You need to move on

Next time when someone asks you if you approve of assault rifle ownership, be sure to clearly tell them about your favorite sandwich. Don't hold back.

 

[exGOPer]

Its very simple
There is no serious International law of war that Israel is being questioned on...
Before they attack drop pamphlets, make phone calls, send texts and email warning the citizens where they are bombing and what time...
Hamas does not, They put live babies in ovens

Another speech.

Who is defending Hamas here? Nobody

Funny how you have to keep bringing up a terrorist organization to defend Israel's actions.

Because you have no answers when it comes to mass murder of children while you call yourself 'pro life'

 

[Mercor]

Next time when someone asks you if you approve of assault ownership, be sure to clearly tell them about your favorite sandwich. Don't hold back.

Why cant you understand.
I am against the misuse and illegal use of all weapons
Some one with comprehension would understand that to mean the legality of guns should be about the use and not the ownership
If you understand my answer then you just reached grade 5 in reading comprehension.

 

[Mercor]

Another speech.

Who is defending Hamas here? Nobody

Funny how you have to keep bringing up a terrorist organization to defend Israel's actions.

Because you have no answers when it comes to mass murder of children while you call yourself 'pro life'

This is the first line from my answer
There is no serious violation of International law of war that Israel is being questioned on...

 

[UsualName]

This was your question
And what are your views on assault rifle ownership?

My answer
I am against the misuse and illegal use of guns, knives, bats, cars, fists, pool sticks...all things that can hurt people

This statement can not be clearer...I am against the misue and illegal use of weapons

That’s a non-statement if anyone has ever been made. I’m against the misuse of nuclear weapons so they should be legal.

 

[exGOPer]

This is the first line from my answer
There is no serious violation of International law of war that Israel is being questioned on...

Your answer is irrelevant, nobody asked your opinion on international law.

Thousands of children are dead from constant bombing of basically a land locked prison and you can't even bring yourself to say anything about it as a pro life absolutist other than legalese that no one asked for.

 

[Mercor]

Your answer is irrelevant, nobody asked your opinion on international law.

Thousands of children are dead from constant bombing of basically a land locked prison and you can't even bring yourself to say anything about it as a pro life absolutist other than legalese that no one asked for.

Wars need to be fought according to International law....Not fought based on your feelings

 

[gwb-trading]

AGAIN

WHO IS TALKING ABOUT HAMAS HERE?

It's wrong for Hamas to commit terrorism

AND it's wrong for Israrel to mass murder children.

What is so hard about this position?

There is no need to WHATABOUT this, you can condem wrong things without WHATABOUT WHATABOUT.

So let's outline a equivalent scenario. Mexico is taken over by a cartel terrorist gang as their government. The terrorists start launching rockets over the U.S border killing civilians in the U.S. Then one day the terrorists in Mexico invade the U.S., brutally kill thousands of our civilians and kidnap hundreds as hostages who are dragged back to Mexico.

Do you really think the U.S. military under direction of our government would not invade Mexico to stop the terrorism, end the rocket launches and attempt to get our citizens back?

Let's say the terrorists were using Mexican civilians as human shields and not allowing them to leave the conflict area. Do you really think this would cause the U.S. to re-think militarily invading Mexico to end the threat in the least bit?

Even if there were Mexican civilian casualties? We would do our best to minimize them but it would not change to focus to finish the job of completely eliminating the terrorists in Mexico.