Election 2024 Foreplay

There are shifts in the traditional media too. Although I am prone to diss on CNN and their loss of viewership, it is nevertheless relevant. Those people have not stopped watching cable. More of them are over on Fox and Fox has migrant coverage at a level that gives viewers more outrage than they get from the border invasion deniers.

Also, the New York Times has turned on Biden bigtime. One of their headlines was very simple and just said that- regardless of the details and issues- Biden simply is not popular anymore. Of course they are not therefore rooting for Trump, they are just trying to move Biden along.

And, of note, in regard to media is Fox. I remember wayyy wayyy back last spring I repeatedly said that I could not see Trump getting the nomination without Fox. So he would have to either turn that around or it was not going to work out for him Rupert Murdoch had flat out announced that his "goal was to make Trump a non -person." Trump suddenly became persona non grata on Fox. It was eery. But then Murdoch's sons took over and decided they wanted the viewership. So Trump got lucky and it did turn around. And Fox is back to being an extension of the Trump campaign. DeSantis obviously did not benefit from the Trump becoming the official Fox candidate. I mean- yowzer- the Trump coverage is massive.

To be fair the Times tends to go after democrats the closer we get to the general election. You may recall or not the Hillary frenzy over at the Times was outrageous in 2016.
 
To be fair the Times tends to go after democrats the closer we get to the general election. You may recall or not the Hillary frenzy over at the Times was outrageous in 2016.

It all makes sense at a basic level.

The Times and all the lefty media are looking for the leftiest candidate who can win.

Thus in 2016, they supported Hillary bigtime in the beginning and defended her endlessly and covered for all of her "issues" because she was the leftiest thing that they had going.

Then when a prettier and leftier face (Obama) came along and got traction they threw her under the bus to the point where she openly said that she got better treatment on Fox. Ouch.

They are aching to do the same thing to Biden, but they can't/could not get a real primary going.
 
Majority of Asians also, live in the Democrat plantation because they benefit from it like some blacks.

But it is also true that many/most do not live on the plantation, and if the progressives spot them getting ahead in any area they try to hold them down.

Again, they are treated like White Colonials. The progressive blacks run to the courts like little pussies and try to ban "too many" Asians from working hard and studying hard and getting into all those good schools. What are the Asians thinking? That is the American way, not the progressive way. They cannot have that.
 
Last edited:
upload_2024-3-3_16-45-20.png


Not only has the border bill not hurt republicans or neutralized their strongest issue,Trump is still ahead of Biden on that specific issue.

Usuallywrong wrong as usual



upload_2024-3-3_16-48-56.png



upload_2024-3-3_16-49-55.png
 
It all makes sense at a basic level.

The Times and all the lefty media are looking for the leftiest candidate who can win.

Thus in 2016, they supported Hillary bigtime in the beginning and defended her endlessly and covered for all of her "issues" because she was the leftiest thing that they had going.

Then when a prettier and leftier face (Obama) came along and got traction they threw her under the bus to the point where she openly said that she got better treatment on Fox. Ouch.

They are aching to do the same thing to Biden, but they can't/could not get a real primary going.

I actually think it’s a lot different than that. I think the Times gets themselves into a sanctimonious tizzy as the general election approaches and ends up crucifying democrats as a mea culpa for accurately reporting on republicans.
 
Back
Top