Election 2024 Foreplay

smallfil said:
They will massively cheat like on November 8, 2020. RINO Governors and Secretary of State, looked the other way, instead of investigating the massive fraud happening under their very noses. I expect Georgia and Arizona to be the states involved. There will be other states no doubt but, it was so easy last time out, I doubt they will clean out their act. Those RINOs still hate President Donald Trump.
More...

It's not cheating if its legal. If mail-in ballots and drop boxes and things like that are legal by law, then you can't call it cheating. You can do it just as well as they do it, and get it to the point where the democrats start calling out Repbulicans for doing it. That's what the GOP should be doing - improving their ground game.

Then legislation will be passed to stop it, but only when one side no longer has an advantage by it.
 
SunTrader said:
Wait I thought the Clown was the king of NJ, not Bruce Springsteen or Jon Bon Jovi?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-takes-hit-jersey-5-040555615.html

Trump takes a hit in New Jersey: 5 takeaways from Tuesday’s primaries
More...

From your article:

By time of publication on Tuesday night, Biden had received 84 percent support in New Mexico, while the uncommitted vote — a movement largely formed in protest to his handling of the Israel-Hamas war — received close to 10 percent. Democratic longshot contender Marianne Williamson also received close to 7 percent.

Meanwhile, Trump received 85 percent support with 76 percent of the estimated vote accounted for. But close to 15 percent of GOP primary voters voted for either Trump rival Nikki Haley, Christie or “uncommitted.”
​
So Trump did better than Biden in NM - which is a clearly blue state?

And in NJ:

In New Jersey, meanwhile, close to 9 percent voted uncommitted, though Biden clinched 88 percent of the vote with 66 percent of the estimated vote in at time of publication.
​
They never said what Trump got. I wonder why?
 
Front-cover-06-05-2024.jpg
 
Tsing Tao said:
It's not cheating if its legal. If mail-in ballots and drop boxes and things like that are legal by law, then you can't call it cheating. You can do it just as well as they do it, and get it to the point where the democrats start calling out Repbulicans for doing it. That's what the GOP should be doing - improving their ground game.

Then legislation will be passed to stop it, but only when one side no longer has an advantage by it.
More...

It is if you are taking ballots of dead people, people in nursing homes, people who have moved, etc. There is ample of evidence of it including, the mules who are depositing ballots by the hundreds in multiple locations in the movie, 2000 Mules, all of it recorded in security cameras and even hidden cameras of the mules talking about it. What you are allowed is take the ballots of relatives in your home and drop it off in the drop boxes. Stealing someone else's ballots and voting it is a felony if they were to enforce the laws on the books.
 
smallfil said:
It is if you are taking ballots of dead people, people in nursing homes, people who have moved, etc. There is ample of evidence of it including, the mules who are depositing ballots by the hundreds in multiple locations in the movie, 2000 Mules, all of it recorded in security cameras and even hidden cameras of the mules talking about it. What you are allowed is take the ballots of relatives in your home and drop it off in the drop boxes. Stealing someone else's ballots and voting it is a felony if they were to enforce the laws on the books.
More...

I'm not saying it hasn't occurred. I'm saying that actual proof of this being widespread is very hard to find.
 
Tsing Tao said:
I'm not saying it hasn't occurred. I'm saying that actual proof of this being widespread is very hard to find.
More...

The Arizona Audit revealed numerous irregularities, even breaking down the number of votes. That is inspite, of the Arizona governor and Secretary of State spending tens of millions of dollars to stymie the investigations. If it was all kosher, they would have cooperated. Also, the 2000 Mules operation was in multiple states so, add up all the ballots involved and it was at a minimum and conservative estimates in the hundreds of thousands atleast. We could have avoided it if the US Supreme Court did their job and took on the election fraud cases. Atleast, the allegations would have been looked at. Instead, Justice John Roberts claim is they were afraid of the riots, so refused to hear those cases. The US Supreme Court dropped the ball on something of utmost importance to the interests of the United States.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top