I only post trade entries for the following week -any dickhead can pull up a chart from February and say "Here's what I did" I was asked to write for a blog that has a weekly options trade in the UK. 228 trades later- <20 small losers.
I only post trade entries for the following week.. 228 trades later- <20 small losers.
I give some points to KCalhoun, at least he posted a real statement, even if it was 12 years old.
It is funny to see that the only one who posted a real account got attacked while all the other fakers who posted NOTHING escape the "execution of the fakers". Tells a lot about the people who attacked KCalhoun.
The only point they have is that the performance was from 2009. Should have been more recent.
Well maybe like trading you have to take what the market gives you. Apparently actual trading is not important to prospective customer.That's the entire point of my thread.
Educators should be able to show proof that at least they really trade.
But they don't, and I'm surprised people buy courses etc from posers who have no proof that they trade at all.
Who in the hell would know? I am pretty sure few people can stay awake long enough in his videos.is al brooks a winning trader? In his webinar, he only mentioned his trades afterwards, never heard him saying I buy right now etc.
Free advertising of sorts. I would think that obviousand you started this thread why???
I bought all of his four books, never finished half of any books. Same on his videos.Who in the hell would know? I am pretty sure few people can stay awake long enough in his videos.
Why would you buy the second book if you didn't finish the first?I bought all of his four books, never finished half of any books. Same on his videos.