Per compliance regs I make no profitability nor performance claims.
Of the pro traders I know, none of us would even blink at a $10k day...it's a rounding error. While I understand the point of your OP post, you kind of threw yourself to the wolves. I'd suggest throwing your trades into Traderview to give us some stats on your performance. It's super easy and free with trial.
And the other way around is just as valid. A good trader may not be a good educator. What you're selling Ken is yourself. Your pitch, communication style, personality.. are all more valuable than content. As a former statistician, you're probably structured and organized, believe in logical arguments with the important understanding of the grey areas of probability. Your skill set must be molded through marketing and branding.. Who is your customer? What do they really want from you? Who else could be your customer? How would you attract them?An educator can know perfectly how to trade, but not being able to trade himself because of various reasons. Emotional, psychological, mental, or stress problems are a few of the possible causes why he does not trade himself.
Per compliance regs I make no profitability nor performance claims.
Can you point me to those regs? I have looked and don't seem to be able to find anything.Per compliance regs I make no profitability nor performance claims.
KCalhoun,For over 20 years, I've long said about trading gurus & educators: "if they can't prove they trade, it's just charade"
And yet virtually no educators other than myself and a few others show PnL proof of recent trades.... they're mostly bs posers and marketers.
I'm convinced that many of you would be much better at teaching than the name brand educators, because you have genuine experience.
I'm honestly at a loss to understand why tf would anyone spend any money on courses or chatrooms by my competitors, given most have no tax return or PnL proof that they actually trade real money accounts?
I believe there should be some requirement that educators be required to prove they are real traders with at least 1 profitable year, like me.
Not posers, which unfortunately I honestly believe are most of them. I'm glad to see recent ftc/sec/cftc enforcement actions (thx emmett).
But help me understand..... why don't retail traders think to require proof that educators are real money competent traders? Boggles the mind, big elephant in the room.
Seriously, many of you would imho be much more capable of teaching than the full time poser educators.
And why would anyone believe YouTube videos from scammer educators claiming to make $20,000+ a day? Caveat emptor
Coming from a corporate background (I was a statistician for Ford) it's puzzling to me why an industry populated by non-authentic people is allowed to exist.
Hello trend2009,I am always curious why a winning trader wastes time to teach instead of making millions from the mkt directly.