Quote from tradingjournals:
Proper definition of risk (not the one perceived, but the actual) implies: lower risk, higher reward. Buying a bottom has an infinite reward/risk, and shorting a top the same. That is why nailing a top or a bottom is only done (in addition to the liars) by the best, the few, the proud, the ....
Quote from tradingjournals:
Buying a bottom has an infinite reward/risk, and shorting a top the same. That is why nailing a top or a bottom is only done (in addition to the liars) by the best, the few, the proud, the ....
Quote from tradingjournals:
How does a strategy allow for mistakes?
Quote from kut2k2:
How does "only risk 1% of your account balance on any single trade" give you an edge? You're the one who brought up position sizing in an edge thread. Strictly speaking, position sizing is separate from edge.
Quote from dbphoenix:
Yes, I understand. But since one doesn't know in advance what price will do, it doesn't make the slightest difference what criteria are used to select the trade unless those criteria stem from live, real-time trading. Criteria that are in the trader's head rather than in the market are smoke and can be relied on to pretty much the same extent.

Quote from Yukoner:
Ok, I had to read this a few times to make sure I clearly understand your position. I totally agree with using criteria that stem from live, real-time trading... But I believe there can be criteria in a trader's head that is also valid and not smoked up.
How about confidence? What criteria do you use to determine if you are confident enough to trade today?