Quote from ByLoSellHi:
I'm not claiming the people making the decisions are the right ones, or that the medicine they're prescribing is the right medication or dosage -
I am saying that anyone claiming we should adopt a hands off approach, let banks and ANY businesses just fail without regard to their purpose or function in this consumer-led economy, when many people can't get credit to buy cars and homes, or smaller things that are also very important to keep the economy functioning - which IS happening now, and which Stossel seems to gloss over as an apparently unimportant facet of the economic disucssion - well, listen to those types, and we WILL have an all out depression.
Personally, I think we get "all out depression" anyway... and all of this stimulus only jeopardizes our potential to recover after "taking the medicine".
The politicos keep telling us "if we don't pursue this course, the banking system will fail"... What if that is an exaggeration? Only a percentage of banks are at such risk. So, let the fuckups fail and the prudent survivors would pick up the ball and resume.. with greater market share for having not been so stupid and greedy.
And if we DID end up with all of this bailout money, I'd have rather still seen the bad banks go bankrupt and have the Gummint use the money to increase the capital of the present good banks... the ones who didn't fuckup... and/or use the same capital to establish NEW banks... they would be unencumbered by toxic assets and could lend.
The plan as imposed looks more like a gigantic CYA... because the "wrong people" are losing...

