Economics of Renting vs. Owning

Quote from drmarkan:

I think that the problem with the original debate is that it all depends on circumstances. I own a home and I will tell you that I have made a killing. I bought the home May of 2003 for $385,000.00 with $150,000.00 down. I borrowed $235,000.00 which comes out to a payment of $1735.00 a month including T&I. I rent 3 of the four rooms out to friends for a total of $1325.00 a month. I pay the electricity and live in the master bedroom. Basically I am paying $525.00 a month. The house now appraises for $700,000.00 (I'm in Southern California). So on a $150,000.00 investment, I have made a capital gain of $315,000.00 in 3 years which is tax free because the home is set up as a primary residence. That makes me feel that owning is better than renting. However, if I lived in Michigan, I may not feel the same way because house values there don't move the same way. Also, if I wanted to, I could sell the home and buy a townhome for $450,000.00 and never have to pay another mortgage.

Of course the person that buys the home from me will most likely not have as cherry a situation that I did, so maybe they should keep renting rather than buying.

1) You better hope the IRS doesn't find out you rented out rooms in your home and try to claim the exemption.

2) Unless you're married you have a potential 250K exemption and a 65K LT Cap Gain.
 
Quote from crackedback:

1) You better hope the IRS doesn't find out you rented out rooms in your home and try to claim the exemption.

2) Unless you're married you have a potential 250K exemption and a 65K LT Cap Gain.

Don't tell nobody. :D
 
Lets not forget that he is in the position to eliminate his mortgage if he downsizes and/or moves to a cheaper area of the country.

Living mortgage free for the rest of your life is pretty cool. Living mortgage free in .5M$ home is out of this world. Chick magnet too...:)
 
Quote from jmccain:

Lets not forget that he is in the position to eliminate his mortgage if he downsizes and/or moves to a cheaper area of the country.

Living mortgage free for the rest of your life is pretty cool. Living mortgage free in .5M$ home is out of this world. Chick magnet too...:)

Issue is SoCal real estate. Live and learn.

John
 
05-12-06 11:31 AM

Condo in Tarzana ,CA was appraised for $570K has been on the market from August 2005 listed for 550K sold by the end of January 2006 for $470K.

You can see it if you go to zillow.com
5477 Nestle ave, Tarzana CA 91356 unit #17. You can see that it is appraised at $570k and sold for $470K
 
Quote from balda:

05-12-06 11:31 AM

Condo in Tarzana ,CA was appraised for $570K has been on the market from August 2005 listed for 550K sold by the end of January 2006 for $470K.

You can see it if you go to zillow.com
5477 Nestle ave, Tarzana CA 91356 unit #17. You can see that it is appraised at $570k and sold for $470K

How much did you buy it for, how long did you live there, and what was the balance of your mortgage at the time of the sale?
 
There's absolutely no question that in hindsight, home ownership has been a fantastic investment over the last 5 years throughout California. In perfect hindsight, only an idiot would have rented in 2000 or 2002.

However, it is precisely the fact that home owners have done so well in the past that makes renting a much better use of money today.

Martin
 
Quote from balda:

05-12-06 11:31 AM

Condo in Tarzana ,CA was appraised for $570K has been on the market from August 2005 listed for 550K sold by the end of January 2006 for $470K.

You can see it if you go to zillow.com
5477 Nestle ave, Tarzana CA 91356 unit #17. You can see that it is appraised at $570k and sold for $470K


Zillow has the price the home sold for ?

The price they show as mkt value is the tax assessment.
Depending on how long ago the town was reassessed the
tax assessment may or may not be the same as mkt value.
 
what if you incorporate your self and take a 25% home office deduction ? probably should work that into your model. I rent a 2 acre home on the the Gold coast of Long Island for about the same as a nice 1 BR in NYC.
 
You use the term "appraisal" but I think you mean "assessed value". They really are quite different. An appraisal in an unbiased opinion of market value by a licensed/certified appraiser. An assessed value is a value according to a uniform schedule for tax rolls in "ad valorem" taxation. Appraisals are NOT public information, in fact an appraiser could lose his/her license for disclosing without permission of the client. Assessed values tend to lag the market, so it's not unusual to see assessed values below market value in a rising market and above market value in a declining market. In fact, it's rare that they match at any given time.



Quote from balda:

05-12-06 11:31 AM

Condo in Tarzana ,CA was appraised for $570K has been on the market from August 2005 listed for 550K sold by the end of January 2006 for $470K.

You can see it if you go to zillow.com
5477 Nestle ave, Tarzana CA 91356 unit #17. You can see that it is appraised at $570k and sold for $470K
 
Back
Top