After running correlations and building regressing models, I couldn't come up with many significant relationships between economic data and the stock market returns; therefore, I ask the for opinions of anyone who cares to comment. Did you find any statistically significant relationships between economic data: GDP, corp. profits, change in interest rates, etc and the future (or even current) returns of the stock market?
The obvious answer to this question is that stock prices tend to discount the economic data, and by the time the data is out, it is already priced in the market. Therefore, any kind of forward looking relationships will not exist: great GDP growth in the last quarter will not predict stock market returns next quarter. Then following this rationale there has to be a significant relationship b/n current quarter corporate profits and SP500 returns, because as the information about earnings, sales etc. leaks out to the market as the quarter progresses the stock prices will appreciate or depreciate to reflect the fundaments. The core assumption of financial theory is that the stock prices reflect growth in corporate earnings in a long run. Well, the statistics shows otherwise: I ran returns of SP500 vs. Corporate profits by quarter (1970-2003)and the R^2 came out to be 1.5% (!!!). Statistically it means that only 1.5% of SP500 change in any quarter is explained by a change in corporate profits. Makes one question a value of fundamental analysis and attempt to predict corporate earnings, doesât it? Even if one is a forecasting genius, and predicts corporate profits growth with 100% accuracy, it will help to explain 1.5% move in SP500! I may be better of flipping a coin to decide either to go long or short, the odds will be much better.
Any comments?
DVB
The obvious answer to this question is that stock prices tend to discount the economic data, and by the time the data is out, it is already priced in the market. Therefore, any kind of forward looking relationships will not exist: great GDP growth in the last quarter will not predict stock market returns next quarter. Then following this rationale there has to be a significant relationship b/n current quarter corporate profits and SP500 returns, because as the information about earnings, sales etc. leaks out to the market as the quarter progresses the stock prices will appreciate or depreciate to reflect the fundaments. The core assumption of financial theory is that the stock prices reflect growth in corporate earnings in a long run. Well, the statistics shows otherwise: I ran returns of SP500 vs. Corporate profits by quarter (1970-2003)and the R^2 came out to be 1.5% (!!!). Statistically it means that only 1.5% of SP500 change in any quarter is explained by a change in corporate profits. Makes one question a value of fundamental analysis and attempt to predict corporate earnings, doesât it? Even if one is a forecasting genius, and predicts corporate profits growth with 100% accuracy, it will help to explain 1.5% move in SP500! I may be better of flipping a coin to decide either to go long or short, the odds will be much better.
Any comments?
DVB