Quite often those are some self proclaimed bs rating agencies.Who decides the economic event impact level, is it by the website? because I see the same event is (high) in website and (medium impact) in other
thank you, i meant the events in the forex calendar, some events are 3 stars (high impact) on one of these fx calendar website and "low impact" in anotherQuite often those are some self proclaimed bs rating agencies.
Like those from 08 who gave triple A's to those junk CDOs loans (?) (Forgot the symbol).
Then there's Zacks etc.
Maybe it derives from the average rating scores of multiple economists. Yet those might be biased as well. Bribed etc.
Anyway, Warren placed it well :
,,Never seen a wealthy economist in my life"
Peter Lynch :
,,If you spend 15 mins. reading about economy, then you just wasted 13 mins"
Quite often those are some self proclaimed bs rating agencies.
Like those from 08 who gave triple A's to those junk CDOs loans (?) (Forgot the symbol).
Then there's Zacks etc.
Maybe it derives from the average rating scores of multiple economists. Yet those might be biased as well. Bribed etc.
Anyway, Warren placed it well :
,,Never seen a wealthy economist in my life"
Peter Lynch :
,,If you spend 15 mins. reading about economy, then you just wasted 13 mins"
thank you, i meant the events in the forex calendar, some events are 3 stars (high impact) on one of these fx calendar website and "low impact" in another
It depends on the historical volatility on those events whether they are low or high impact I would say. See illustration below therefore.View attachment 297981
Who decides the economic event impact level, is it by the website? because I see the same event is (high) in website and (medium impact) in other