Quote from kwancy:
Romik, so you basically use the S/R as a binary decision system. If a stock (or ES, whatever product it is) breaks a major resistance, supported with other technical indicators, then you go long the stock. If it appears that the stock does not have the strength to break the resistance, you go short. Vice versa for support. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I do find this method works very well. But here are some downsides I found. Despite the comission problem
1.) It is very subjective to call resistance and support of different time-frames...what about moving averages and bollinger band (I assume you use fib. levels too in a trend day)? if you are to include these two you will have a lot of levels and traders will be tempted to over-trade.
2.) Just like many technical analysis, this is very easy to be faded out or losing its effectiveness once it gets the popularity. I guess that is the major reason why I found this works particular well sometimes but at the other time it sucks.
Anyone open for discussion of what oscillator(s) complement best with the S/R strategy?
1. Hence I suggested using predominantly weekly levels, as they are pretty obvious. You can make this as simple or as complex as you desire.
2. I do use RSI (divergences & failure swings) & MACD (divergences/signal & 0 line cross). Nothing else. I also have bollingers on charts to measure potential profit targets, but you will find that good old S/R works just as well if not better.
Yes, S/R is a subjective matter, as you have tons of them out there. But that is why this method does not rely on any intraday based level.
