Does your definition of "being a trader" include a consistently positive equity curve?
I'm not hating on you Padu just genuinely curious. Because if I ask myself that question the answer is yes. If you lose money consistently then you are by definition a loser, or sucker. I understand having a string of loses even after you are consistent...but IMO you need to have an equity curve as close to 45deg as possible, example:
View attachment 328565
So I think what SLM is saying...is simple...like him. By definition, the primary thing needed to be a trader is to make money consistently.
So if one isn't making money, then one is messing up. Winners (traders) and losers (gamblers).
in what line of work do you make money consistently before you learn and train for 20 years?
lawyer? engineer ? doctor? senator ? pilot. nuclear engineer. mathematician. college lecturer or professor.
forget it . learn for 20 years then you call me failure.