easiest money in my life

the result of energy is price
This sentence shows that your understanding of volume analysis (or how and why the market moves) is extremely shallow. Sorry I have to say that. What moves the market is aggressiveness versus passivity, not the volume amount.
Brooks five five-minute bars are just the smoke coming out of the car's exhaust..
Analyze the energy, not its result.Or shell I say the result of the energy will be more accurate.
 
It's just funny how Padu berates people for not trading while he is in simulator mode. The thread title "easiest money of my life" is the greatest considering it's not really money.

The best part is all of these lightbulb moments following a guru for 20 years with no success.

I've listened to quite a few of Brooks videos and he reminds me of a psychic. I have no ill will towards Padu - I'm actually rooting for him in the market - but he is kind of a dick to anyone who questions him.

the "easiest money in my life" was made in a Paper account?
 
This sentence shows that your understanding of volume analysis (or how and why the market moves) is extremely shallow. Sorry I have to say that. What moves the market is aggressiveness versus passivity, not the volume amount.
Brooks five five-minute bars are just the smoke coming out of the car's exhaust..
Analyze the energy, not its result.Or shell I say the result of the energy will be more accurate.

Not only shallow knowledge about volume but about indicators as well it seems.

RSI absolutely isn't a leading indicator since it's reacting on what happened, not trying to predict what is going happen.
 
the "easiest money in my life" was made in a Paper account?
Yes, that’s the beauty of it! All the benefits of a real account without the risk. The answer was in front of us the whole time!




I started following Big P after he said something like “You don’t need sophisticated to make money or be successful” about Dest’s Options strategies. Lord Dest never once said you do. I thought it was insulting, like a Candy-striper telling a neurosurgeon they don’t need education to perform surgery.
 
RSI absolutely isn't a leading indicator since it's reacting on what happened, not trying to predict what is going happen.
you are jokers
e9.png
 

You shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet :banghead:. There are plenty of articles saying it ISN'T leading.

How can an indicator that reacts on what already happened be leading :rolleyes:?

Edit: some see RSI as leading because it can turn around and go up before the actual market, but that doesn't make it a leading indicator. It reacts on what already has happened, price has to move first before RSI can move, making it a lagging indicator.

Unbelievable that something so easy and basic has to be explained to someone who has been trading for 30 years ...

You proved, once again, who the joke is.
 
Back
Top