You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Earth Day Predictions
- Thread starter Arnie
- Start date
Quote from gwb-trading:
Look FC pulled out his fake pie graph claiming that their were only 68 global cooling papers in the 70s again. This has already been debunked completely with multiple links to thousands of scientific papers from the 70s covering global cooling.
FC ... do you get tired of continually posting fabricated nonsense?
It has not been debunked at all. The subject of " thousands of papers" you presented were not relevant to the discussion. We went through this already, remember? You continue to allow yourself to be duped by the fossil fuel interests and their fraudulent websites. I have already exposed at least three cases of this fraudulent misrepresentation. One of which was your supposed "thousands of papers covering global cooling" which was a fraudulent presentation. Hint: articles in magazines do not count. We are talking actual scientific papers. Not popular tabloid articles like in Times magazine.
Damn your memory is bad. There were over 1000 peer reviewed articles denying AGW. Not the hand full you and your author claim.Quote from futurecurrents:
It has not been debunked at all. The subject of " thousands of papers" you presented were not relevant to the discussion. We went through this already, remember? You continue to allow yourself to be duped by the fossil fuel interests and their fraudulent websites. I have already exposed at least three cases of this fraudulent misrepresentation. One of which was your supposed "thousands of papers covering global cooling" which was a fraudulent presentation. Hint: articles in magazines do not count. We are talking actual scientific papers. Not popular tabloid articles like in Times magazine.
You can't be any more wrong about the facts.
Quote from pspr:
That's his job. I'm sure he gets paid by someone on the left to keep repeating the lies. It seems he got a bump in pay this week to post more often.
He already lost the argument decisively in this thread
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=258259&highlight=global+warming
Says who, you? Every science organization in the world, virtually all it's climate scientists and common sense agrees with me.
Fact is the CO2 levels in the atmosphere have gone up 35% in the last 150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How could that NOT cause warming? It's a very simple concept ........that the fossil fuel industry wants to keep us confused about. Virtually all the world's climate scientists and all it's science organizations are in agreement. The science is settled. The deniers just look ignorant and foolish at this point.
Quote from pspr:
Damn your memory is bad. There were over 1000 peer reviewed articles denying AGW. Not the hand full you and your author claim.
You can't be any more wrong about the facts.
We are talking about numbers of scientific papers about global warming vs cooling in the seventies. Do try to keep up.
And now you're just posting a bunch of bullshit again. There is only proof that CO2 is responsive to heat, not the miniscule amount man puts in the atmosphere. The release from the oceans dwarfs what man does.Quote from futurecurrents:
Says who, you? Every science organization in the world, virtually all it's climate scientists and common sense agrees with me.
Fact is the CO2 levels in the atmosphere have gone up 35% in the last 150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How could that NOT cause warming? It's a very simple concept ........that the fossil fuel industry wants to keep us confused about. Virtually all the world's climate scientists and all it's science organizations are in agreement. The science is settled. The deniers just look ignorant and foolish at this point.
You just don't know the science and keep posting false and misleading information.
Are you going to admit that there has been no warming for the last 17 years or are you going to stick to that lie too?
Quote from pspr:
And now you're just posting a bunch of bullshit again. There is only proof that CO2 is responsive to heat, not the miniscule amount man puts in the atmosphere. The release from the oceans dwarfs what man does.
You just don't know the science and keep posting false and misleading information.
Are you going to admit that there has been no warming for the last 17 years or are you going to stick to that lie too?
OK, how's this?
Fact is the CO2 levels in the atmosphere have gone up 35% in the last 150 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and next to solar variations is the biggest influence over the earth's climate even though it is only a few hundred parts per million. How could that NOT cause warming? It's a very simple concept ........that the fossil fuel industry wants to keep us confused about. Virtually all the world's climate scientists and all it's science organizations are in agreement. The science is settled. The deniers just look ignorant and foolish at this point.
You just don't understand the science as it is understood today, FC. The alarmists are playing you and people like you for fools. And you can't even admit there has been no warming for the last 17 years!
Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warmingâit was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.
The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling, perhaps much deeper than the global cooling from about 1945 to 1977. Just how much cooler the global climate will be during this cool cycle is uncertain. Recent solar changes suggest that it could be fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. A more drastic cooling, similar to that during the Dalton and Maunder minimums, could plunge the Earth into another Little Ice Age, but only time will tell if that is likely.
Don J. Easterbrook is Professor Emeritus of Geology at Western Washington University. Bellingham, WA.
Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warmingâit was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.
The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling, perhaps much deeper than the global cooling from about 1945 to 1977. Just how much cooler the global climate will be during this cool cycle is uncertain. Recent solar changes suggest that it could be fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. A more drastic cooling, similar to that during the Dalton and Maunder minimums, could plunge the Earth into another Little Ice Age, but only time will tell if that is likely.
Don J. Easterbrook is Professor Emeritus of Geology at Western Washington University. Bellingham, WA.