Spindr0, I appreciate this exercise, however Im not sure I know how to go about calculating this manually.....Quote from spindr0:
1) you said candidates needed a minimum IV gap of 15 points
5 BP's needed to evaluate a position NOT do it
2) So this would mean your selling near months and buying more far out months(higher strike), correct? this gives you a positive Vega position. I would have thought if you are betting on a close of the gap and a general decrease in the IV you would be heavy on the near options. What is the line of thinking with that?
If your belief is that the underlying isn't going to move, go heavy on the near term options.
3) Ive gone back and tried it on a few previous EA's but yet to find th eright conditions for it. Any specific EA's that worked that come to mind?
Here's a hypothetical for you.
Consider a calendar strangle.
Stock at 52
Price a near month 50/55 at .65
Price a 2nd month at .50
Overnight post EA expectation is .45 (pretend both will go there)
What would be a ratio of contracts bot/sold that would balance the maximum loss in either direction? Then, would the risk graph have an acceptable risk/reward ratio?
Do the same evaluation for diagonals.
These types of positions may not be for you but until you start modeling them, you won't know and all the word descriptions in the world will be meaningless.
What I can gather from the above info is with a 1:1 ratio, the near month would return a profit of 20 cents (.65 -> .45) and the far mnth would return a loss of 5 cents(.50 -> .45)
I do understand the importance of modelling it. Its just Ive always used the software, never manually....
