Both metrics would be correlated to some extent, and the one that uses max actual move would give far fewer results. That said, both of them only use the current implied move, which has the problem I mentioned earlier. I now find it more useful (from backtests) to look at the observed/implied moves over the past several quarters. Basically we're trying to short vol on the stocks that tend to have the least surprises in their earnings reports. Also useful to look at the expected straddle value if the stock remains unchanged post earnings. That gives you an idea of your real R/R.
By earnings surprise I guess you meant the underlying overnight move straight after the earnings release (only till the morning at open, and not until the end of that day)? I thought about mainly using "earnings surprise" as a key indicator, as I'd be exiting the next morning anyway, and in that case it really doesn't matter how far the underlying moves for the entire day historically ... just a thought.
Last edited: