Yah true...Hope regulators start looking at this aspect SOOOONSo he admits it.
You're selling fake lottery tickets on a street corner. I'm satisfied, thanks. I am done here.
Yah true...Hope regulators start looking at this aspect SOOOONSo he admits it.
You're selling fake lottery tickets on a street corner. I'm satisfied, thanks. I am done here.
I repeat my question one last time Mr E2T "SO a simple question if Helios and E2 T are owned by same people then the entire business activity: does it make more money by selling tests or share of trading profits ?"We are selling the opportunity to be funded by a trading firm. That trading firm provides you with an account in its company, starting capital and a majority percentage of trading profits. If you treat trading as a lottery ticket to be scratched then that is what your subscription fee will earn you. If you are a disciplined trader, you can pass and get funded, just as one of the more than 500 who have been funded in the last six months have done.
SO a simple question if Helios and E2 T are owned by same people then the entire business activity: does it make more money by selling tests or share of trading profits ?
It is a very valid question going to the core of the transparency of this business model , you just don't want to answer it it seems!With all due respect, the businesses are private entities and your question has no pertinence whatsoever to the question at hand. I would have to say furthermore that I do not know the answer to your question and I am in no position to answer it if I did.
I repeat my question one last time Mr E2T "SO a simple question if Helios and E2 T are owned by same people then the entire business activity: does it make more money by selling tests or share of trading profits ?"
It is a very valid question going to the core of the transparency of this business model , you just don't want to answer it it seems!
All these days you are marketing this aggressively and now you say you don't even know if Helios and E2T are owned by same people! WOW + the "prop" firm is not registered! I am done
- If I had the money and risk management I would either start true prop or first loss fundingtraderjo you could always just start a competing firm to Topstep and E2T and make your platform And Trading combines better than what they both offer and then you can be the one profiting from test fees and profits on trading with the program you designed to be better than either E2T or Topstep. Not being sarcastic here - really it’s a business with a lot of demand and there is always room for 1 more company with a better program that offers traders an improved and better opportunity than what the current co’s offer (while still being a profitable and sustainable business model With high growth potential).
We are transparent, that is why everyone knows what has happened to our former co-founder, but you are asking a private company to disclose its revenue structure, profit and anything else you want to know to an avatar on a public forum. I'm sorry but this is just unrealistic. On another note, there is no requirement for the prop firm to be registered. It is a prop firm and trades its owners money, it is not a pool and does not solicit funds from investors.
Traderjo, you have disliked this business model from day one. We understand that. We've had plenty of discussions about it and you are fully within your rights to reject it. That said, we will continue to sell examinations and provide top quality support and an objective environment for candidates who want to become professional traders. That is our business model.
I was not asking for $ I am just asking what %... If you were reliant on trading profits then from DAY ONE you would have proudly displayed that! instead of rubbishing me.. I never said you are scam or illegal.. any way we will never know... as you say Private company..We are transparent, that is why everyone knows what has happened to our former co-founder, but you are asking a private company to disclose its revenue structure, profit and anything else you want to know to an avatar on a public forum. I'm sorry but this is just unrealistic. On another note, there is no requirement for the prop firm to be registered. It is a prop firm and trades its owners money, it is not a pool and does not solicit funds from investors.
Traderjo, you have disliked this business model from day one. We understand that. We've had plenty of discussions about it and you are fully within your rights to reject it. That said, we will continue to sell examinations and provide top quality support and an objective environment for candidates who want to become professional traders. That is our business model.