You sure? The code of conduct says disrespect for him or management will not be tolerated. That was posted here in the past couple of days.
DWAC, the Trump Social-Media SPAC, Surges: What to Know
- Thread starter kmiklas
- Start date
Yeah, so? There's a world of difference between disrespect and critical thinking/opinion.
For the record, it's 50,000,000 if you eliminate fake votes.
Regardless, although we clearly disagree politically, I wish you well financially. Watch for social media companies taking hits. FB and TWTR both sharply down today.
"You will not replace us", "FAFO", etc. are not critical thinking.
If you can prove it there's an AG in Texas that will give you $1 million. Got proof, or just a flapping hole?
Example: masks risks: inhaled fibers, bacteria & germs, blocked breathing, no allowance for those with asthma, droplets absorbed, difficulties for the deaf/lip-readers, masks are not made for children. This is critical thinking and an opposing point of view.
Agree or disagree, even voicing this position gets you jailed on FB--their Terms of Service agreement trumps freedom of speech! (no pun intended)--but not on DWAPs new platform. Hope remains!
Trump 2024.Benjamin Franklin said:
Last edited:
Actually, I stand self-corrected, fraud was discovered. Here's an update:
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/pol...raud-bounty-it-went-to-an-unlikely-recipient/
All you will have is freedumb. How many times have you been told what free speech means, where it applies and you still have rocks in your head?
The new platform will censor like you have never seen without a tiniest blush of shame.
You will applaud. Really little guy, this man crush you have would be better served at a gay bar. He can't ever love you like you love him. That and know you exist.
FB is full of right wing conspiratards posting absolute horseshit, what jail are you talking about?
Lots and lots of problems trying to build a social media company. The security and ability to keep the platform up is immense. Then there’s the money generator factor that even Twitter hasn’t figured out yet. Compound all of that and history hasn’t shown right wing social media to be successful in the past. Whether it’s Gab, rumble, and the various other places that have tried to gather they’ve all failed.
Now consider the speech expectations of the targeted users and how any site could manage that without 1. Becoming a toxic waste site or 2. Causing the right wing users to become disgruntled with standard and accepted limitations.
From a money making standpoint it is possible but from a viability standpoint there’s a very high hurdle.
Now consider the speech expectations of the targeted users and how any site could manage that without 1. Becoming a toxic waste site or 2. Causing the right wing users to become disgruntled with standard and accepted limitations.
From a money making standpoint it is possible but from a viability standpoint there’s a very high hurdle.