Interesting week so far. Had a "conversation" with the bond market on Tuesday. It went kind of like this:
MPS: That's an interesting market you have there, with the big tick dollar amounts.
ZB: We like the ground to shake a little when someone hits the bid. We do have a reputation of chewing up and spitting out new traders in short order.
MPS: Oh I think I can handle a market that still deals in fractions. For example, I'm looking at a high probability long setup now.
ZB: Assume the position.
MPS: Assume the position?
ZB: You want trade, don't you?
MPS: OK, I'll buy it.
ZB: You're now long. Here we go...
MPS: Jesus! I'm down four ticks instantly. I want out!
ZB: Done. Would you like to try again to get your money back?
MPS: Um, I have some errands to do.
ZB: "There is an ATM just down the street."
The "tone" of the previous statement was between over-politeness and condescending, kind of like from a waiter in fancy restaurant after you've pounded the table in order to make a point and accidentally hitting the edge of a bowl of soup and getting yourself splashed.
I ended up losing 3 ticks on T-notes on Tuesday.
Tuesday evening I had the idea of shorting ES or its derivatives for a range expansion day. Although money flows to correlated assets were bullish, price action in ES seemed different from the recent past. My sense was in previous corrections and subsequent rallies in ES the bids would be stronger. To borrow a line from the band Aerosmith, the market's getup and go got up and went. I debated a while how I should to play this. After considering gamma scalping, butterfly spreads, bear spreads, long puts, and a put ratio spread, I decided to buy a ratio spread. Oops.
Bought 1 Oct 10, 2018 ESZ2018 2970 put / sold 2 Oct 10, 2018 ESZ2018 2955 Puts at a $.90 debit. My stop was to be about $1.10 credit, or about $100 plus transaction costs. My decision to trade the ratio spread route was based on the idea that the expected ES decline would not get out of hand. Oops again. I figured apparent support of 2860 in ES would hold, at least for a while if tested. The 2855 short leg was chosen to give me a little more protection on the downside.
At roughly 10:00 am (I say roughly because my confirmation and blotter times do not match) and under fast market conditions, I briefly debated between taking a $250 loss or converting this trade into a butterfly spread. ES was near 2855 at the time and I decided to buy a Oct 10, 2019 ES 2840 put at $3.75. My overall basis in this butterfly spread was $4.65. Had I simply bought this butterfly spread in the first place, my basis would have been around $1.25 to $1.35 debit. I figured there were ten points in either direction that provided reasonable opportunity for profit. After a bit of a lull in the sell off, I noticed the Nikkei futures hit a new low and previous market leading equities were not recovering. I decided to close this fly at the then current price of $4.50 for a loss of $.15, or $7.50 plus trading costs. Whew! Thank God for break even, almost! I'm done with naked options forever. Had I held on the original ratio spread to the close, my loss would have been over $3000. Two of my other trade ideas would have returned about a $1000 in the first half hour of trading, or tripling my overall account profit over the last 3 months. Lesson learned.
This market sell off is serious business in my opinion. There are competing investments that are less volatile and provide a increased and guaranteed return such as US Government Bonds. In addition, many countries are under fiscal or economic stress such as China, Italy, and smaller developing countries. The US economy is likely to be adversely affected by slowdowns in other countries either directly or indirectly. Trade uncertainties or Brexit can't be helping either. The Federal Reserve is holding to a tightening policy in an apparent attempt to forestall inflation and excessive speculation. Although the Fed's current policy may seem reasonable, it is not without risk of causing an economic slowdown or recession in the US.