Dumbocrats embracing queer marriage

Quote from Lucrum:

Don't get too excited, you still can't marry your gay brother.
More...

I'm no lawyer (pronounced liar), but I'm pretty sure civil union would exactly allow that situation.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

Gays should not be trying to force everyone else to use the term "marriage" for them, just as religious people should not be denying gays of their legal rights to form a civil union for legal purposes.

Both sides are beating their head against the wall trying to force people to accept them when it seems like a very easy solution in my mind......
More...

+ 1

nothing more to it
 
Quote from BSAM:

If a man can marry a man, why can't I have seven wives?
More...
Because that would be a contract between you and 7 different people not a contract between you and 1 different person.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

I'm no lawyer (pronounced liar), but I'm pretty sure civil union would exactly allow that situation.
More...

How incestuous.
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Because the 2010 election was a non presidential election. democrats don't have the same turnout in non presidential elections as they do when its time to vote for the president

That is a fact
More...

its also a fact that Dems have very low voter enthusiasm right now.

They will be lucky to turn out as many Ds as Rs.

The sup. ct decision may have sealed the turnout deal in favor of the Rs.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

Because that would be a contract between you and 7 different people not a contract between you and 1 different person.
More...

... if you can discount the importance of history and the man and women thing... and the caring for progeny, why draw the line at 1 contract... it is a completely arbitrary place to discriminate.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

Because that would be a contract between you and 7 different people not a contract between you and 1 different person.
More...

And your point is...
 
Quote from LEAPup:

Lol! These pieces of shit are going to make same sex marriage a part of their party platform. Mind bending!
More...
LEPERup continues Operation: Overcompensation. Next, he'll go back and have some more lengthy discussions with like-minded gents at that fried chicken joint, where they'll compare their latest lumberjack outfits and accessories. Oh, they'll have such fun.
 
Quote from jem:

why draw the line at 1 contract... it is a completely arbitrary place to discriminate.
More...

just like discriminating between 2 dudes is an arbitrary place to discriminate.....

Like i said before its a contract between 2 people, i dont want to see it be defined as marraige but i dont believe the government should be involved in defining that to begin with. All it is is a contract between 2 people......

If you support the government picking out the way that contract should work, then you would have to be in favour of hate crime laws, and Affirmative action, 2 more bullshit narratives, where the government tries to define who the person is as opposed to simply enforcing contracts where 2 people are involved......

Everyone is a person in the eyes of the law, and whether you are white, black, brown yellow, female, straight should not matter, the government has no business defining what types of people get to be involved in contracts with each other.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top