I agree. The more monitors the better. The more computors the better. The more network bandwidth the better. But more importantly, it's not the quantity of monitors, not even the size of the monitors, it's resolution plus how you use what you have. (Unlike in other areas of the human struggle, where fortunately it's mostly size that matters.)
For example, if you have 3 monitors set to 1024x768 pixels you barely have more raw data display space than on one monitor that's set to 1600x1200, plus you will probably have to waste more of your raw size when it's split up between 3 monitors, at least if you are using a slow and inefficient operating system like MSFT.
The other thing you should keep in mind is that most of the time when you look at a screener or an options table or a news bulletin or whatever else you might be reading during the trading day, you concentrate most of your attention on that piece of information and theoretically only need a very small window that shows an emini chart or a TICK chart or maybe your favorite few stocks for the last 5 minutes, because at that particular second you are not really interested in the fine detail of those charts, you just want to be alerted if the action should pick up or something happens that you are waiting for.
I've said it before, your eyes and your brain can only process so much information per second, so if you find a way to switch between all that information on one single screen as fast as your brain can process it, you will have an advantage over someone who has 8 monitors and does not arrange the data on his displays in a very clever way.
I am using just one monitor at 1600x1200, but I have a "designated immediacy area" on it, which is a little stripe on the right which shows tick charts of the eminis and some other good stuff, and which is always displayed, even if I switch to a different virtual desktop to read something.
In order to follow several dozen intraday charts, I just continuously change the symbol in my main chart window, which is nice and big, that way I look at approximately one or two charts per second. I figure if I had 20 monitors, I could probably scan not 1 to 2, but 5 to 10 charts per second, but I'm not sure that would enable me to make $10000 more in trading profits per year, which I figure would be necessary to buy and maintain 20 monitors (plus video cards and computers to run them).
I am, however thinking about getting a second monitor, because frankly I like the idea of having one or two charts for each open position displayed at all times.
But the question there is, do I just buy another monitor and video card, or do I spend a few hundred bucks more that that and get a nice laptop with a 1600x1200 screen? Of course, then I would also need some networking hardware etc. etc.
Let me check on eBay!
For example, if you have 3 monitors set to 1024x768 pixels you barely have more raw data display space than on one monitor that's set to 1600x1200, plus you will probably have to waste more of your raw size when it's split up between 3 monitors, at least if you are using a slow and inefficient operating system like MSFT.
The other thing you should keep in mind is that most of the time when you look at a screener or an options table or a news bulletin or whatever else you might be reading during the trading day, you concentrate most of your attention on that piece of information and theoretically only need a very small window that shows an emini chart or a TICK chart or maybe your favorite few stocks for the last 5 minutes, because at that particular second you are not really interested in the fine detail of those charts, you just want to be alerted if the action should pick up or something happens that you are waiting for.
I've said it before, your eyes and your brain can only process so much information per second, so if you find a way to switch between all that information on one single screen as fast as your brain can process it, you will have an advantage over someone who has 8 monitors and does not arrange the data on his displays in a very clever way.
I am using just one monitor at 1600x1200, but I have a "designated immediacy area" on it, which is a little stripe on the right which shows tick charts of the eminis and some other good stuff, and which is always displayed, even if I switch to a different virtual desktop to read something.
In order to follow several dozen intraday charts, I just continuously change the symbol in my main chart window, which is nice and big, that way I look at approximately one or two charts per second. I figure if I had 20 monitors, I could probably scan not 1 to 2, but 5 to 10 charts per second, but I'm not sure that would enable me to make $10000 more in trading profits per year, which I figure would be necessary to buy and maintain 20 monitors (plus video cards and computers to run them).
I am, however thinking about getting a second monitor, because frankly I like the idea of having one or two charts for each open position displayed at all times.
But the question there is, do I just buy another monitor and video card, or do I spend a few hundred bucks more that that and get a nice laptop with a 1600x1200 screen? Of course, then I would also need some networking hardware etc. etc.
Let me check on eBay!
