Droughts show global warming is "scientific fact"

[PHOENIX TRADING]

Quote from futurecurrents:

In the field of climate science, the consensus is unequivocal: human activities are causing climate change. [/B]

Who fricken cares?

Anybody?


And better yet ...

WHY should I care ?

 

[Wallet]

Quote from futurecurrents:

What? Bullshit. Complete and total bullshit. Link please.

The science is overwhelming. There is no debate among climate scientists that man's additions of CO2 into the atmosphere is causing the earth to warm up. None. The Koch bros of all people funded a recent study by a scientist who was previously a skeptic. Guess what? He is no longer a skeptic.

Anyone denying man-made global warming might as well wear a sign proclaiming that they are an idiot.

Yes and the same guy stated that the United States wasn't the problem, China, India and other emerging nations were the guilty parties for the present problems...... take it over there and see if they give a flying shit what you think.

 

[peilthetraveler]

Please let the people in south east asia know about these droughts.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/07/world/asia/philippines-floods/index.html

 

[wildchild]

I am going to go out on a limb and make a bold prediction. In the future there will be droughts, floods, heat waves, cold snaps, famine, disease, wars, and all other sorts of nastiness and these events would happen regardless of CO2 output.

 

[Brass]

Quote from futurecurrents:

You do know that by trotting "evidence" like this out, you prove that you are totally clueless about climate.

The stupidity you show is breathtaking.

I'm starting to think that the few GW deniers left are simply mentally retarded.

At this point, I think even the "best" of them are just trying to win the argument for the sake of winning the argument. And they're left with nothing but word play.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from Brass:

At this point, I think even the "best" of them are just trying to win the argument for the sake of winning the argument. And they're left with nothing but word play.

Why don't you address the flooding in asia in your drought theory? Or is the drought-caused-by-global-warming theory only applicable to the US?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Why don't you address the flooding in asia in your drought theory?


Or is the drought-caused-by-global-warming theory only applicable to the US?

EVIL, you should have said evil US.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

...And they're left with nothing but word play.

Says the guy obsessed with word play.

 

[Brass]

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Why don't you address the flooding in asia in your drought theory? Or is the drought-caused-by-global-warming theory only applicable to the US?

Tsing, you know better. Climate change/global warming means we are in for increasingly severe weather shifts, with an average, overall upward drift. Look for increasing volatility in weather futures.

You're trying to finesse a losing argument. And, as I said, you know better. Time to fold.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Brass:

Tsing, you know better. Climate change/global warming means we are in for increasingly severe weather shifts, with an overall, average upward drift...

Droughts show global warming is "scientific fact"