As discussed, the court will require Trump and the government to follow the requirements of the administrative procedures act in unwinding any programs but will not counter the assertion that it can be reversed if those procedures are followed.
This is basically was what ruled in the DAPA case so nothing new. It is a double edged sword for the pro-immigration types because the lefties will promote it as a victory but the victory they need is to see the court rule that the executive order cannot be reversed. Instead, the court keeps saying that when the government does something to eliminate an established program, it must hold all the required hearings, public notifications, hear from witnesses etc. rather than just deciding it wants to do something.
Very dicey for dreamers if Trump wins. The court put bondo and duct tape on it but also outlined- as it did in the DAPA case- a legal roadmap of how the executive order can be reversed.
This is basically was what ruled in the DAPA case so nothing new. It is a double edged sword for the pro-immigration types because the lefties will promote it as a victory but the victory they need is to see the court rule that the executive order cannot be reversed. Instead, the court keeps saying that when the government does something to eliminate an established program, it must hold all the required hearings, public notifications, hear from witnesses etc. rather than just deciding it wants to do something.
Very dicey for dreamers if Trump wins. The court put bondo and duct tape on it but also outlined- as it did in the DAPA case- a legal roadmap of how the executive order can be reversed.
