Drawdowns

Quote from nononsense:

Never talked about "Always IN".
I'm in as little as possible.


Can't argue with that one.
BTW, who near-garantees these winners for you?

There is one thing that sort of near-guarantees winners. It is the fact that the best trades work IMMEDIATELLY in your favor. Other way to put is that as soon as the trade starts to be difficult I begin to plan exit. Yet, anoher way to put it, be able to recognize bad trade from a good one (which is actually not that difficult).
This only works with combination of good entries. Good entries are planned entries and you can only plan a good entry when you have some kind of (valid) methology.
 
Quote from Learner:

What is a drawdown?

Say, after you entered a trade, long YM at 10925, the price moved to 10902, your current position drawdown is -23 points, if you are holding 5 lots your $ drawdown =5x(-23)x$5=-$575.

Am I right?

I am a learner until the day I retired from daytrading.

Is this kind of drawdown only 4 losers? :confused:

What do you do? -$575 in red, winner? :( Holding on don't be a loser!!!!

In fact, there is another -56 points b4 the YM landed, .......:eek:

Not much ETers on this board lose -23 points but -79 points. :D areyoukidding?

Quote from areyoukidding?:

Drawdowns are for losers. We dont have any drawdowns on ET.
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

Interesting...but in Forex when they say Hedge, they mean a long and a short at the same time...[/b] [/B]


I understand. Thats what I was referring to.


Quote from ElectricSavant:

this can be a wasteful way to trade, but you can find the trend... [/B]


Perhaps you see something I don't.

Assuming a forex strategy that risks 1% per trade, a stop of 20 pips (including spread), and hedges by taking the opposite side of the same pair, the net loss for a trade that goes bad should be:

total loss = hedge gain - 1% loss

where,

hedge gain = stop loss - spread / stop loss.

Therefore, hedge gain = 20 - 3 (assuming 3 pip spread) / 20 = .85%


So total loss would be = +.85% - 1% =
-.15%


Assuming a high enough risk:reward ratio, when trades go right, max loss per trade would be limited to 1% (hedge), with the remainder of winnings compensating for the hedge.

This looks good so far. Where am I wrong? Why is this wasteful?


Quote from ElectricSavant:I do not exactly trade like this...but you need to play with it and evolve....the completed hedge can be like an offset on the teeter tottor of balance...[/b] [/B]

You mentioned taking positive carry trades to hedge - or minimize draw down.

But from my understanding, this would only work well for longer term trades; which incidentally also favor classical forex hedging by minimizing the cost of the spread.

On the shorter frequencies (5 min) with tight stops, positive carry trades would earn so little interest in the 5-15 mins they might be on, as to offer very little, or no hedging utility.

Again, I could be wrong.






Quote from ElectricSavant:
You will net out your direction eventually...learn to take some TP out of the flow during your hold...this fortifies your basket making the time worthwhile....[/b] [/B]

A good idea.



Quote from ElectricSavant:
sometimes all this complexity is not necessary, as everything you put on finds its way...react, balance and stratagize....the methodical way is best...

You will eventually be able to withstand whatever the market gives you....you will see...This is more important than yield. when you get this far, then your challenge becomes increasing yield, but you gotta get there first...and this is not gambling...
.[/b] [/B]

Again, much appreciated.

Minimizing drawdowns via hedging isn't something I've explored at much length. So this conversation is really interesting for me.
 
Well your wasting spread...if your using this to discover a direction...but if you use this to take off an extreme on one side and take a risk on its return to the other side, then it is not wasteful...

until you take of one side you will not take a stake in direction...you can do this just with one pair then and save some spread...

I put on hedges at different times (not at the same time) to slow the progress of a real strong trend...instead of using stops

Perhaps you see something I don't.
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

give her a big kiss for me...and tell her your going to be rich :) watch her reaction and hedge your next move if necessary

I've already convinced her I'm jockeying to be the next Warren Buffet ;)
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

but if you use this to take off an extreme on one side and take a risk on its return to the other side, then it is not wasteful...

:)

My entries are made after a directional movement of some force is already established. I enter on a tight stop looking for a big wave.

This could prove really useful for limiting dd. Thanks man!





Quote from ElectricSavant:

until you take of one side you will not take a stake in direction...you can do this just with one pair then and save some spread...

But only with the net effect of having less exposure per trade? Low reward strategies - like scalping - would be better suited towards one pair entries to minimize spread. But high reward strategies negate the cost of spread, making an inverse position practical.


Quote from ElectricSavant:

I put on hedges at different times (not at the same time) to slow the progress of a real strong trend...instead of using stops

Always in? Catch all the move. Interesting way to go about it. Its fascinating how different personality profiles approach dollar extraction from the market in their own, unique ways.
 
Back
Top