Wow...so you're telling me, it's best if most trades are winners and also have a high profit per trade? Damn that's really some next level stuff.
Absolutely no, it is not best most of your trades are winners and you have a high profit per trade, because you could not achieve those results without exposing your capital to massive losses, what I am saying is you need to be shown how to expose less capital while generating better returns, not losses, of which you would absorb 20% or 50% or 80% allowing you to manage the capital more effectively, which is separate to recovery.
The financial markets are designed to make sure you have 92% probability of loss 92% of the time, which equates to the number of millionaires in the world at around 0.5%, which equates to their per year returns expectation of 15-20%, based on them exposing 20% of their net worth to the financial markets, wisdom provides a lot of things, it's the black or white sheep to voting, depending on how you look at it.
If voting mattered they wouldn't let you do it.
If wisdom didn't matter they would let you have it.
Where's that Boeing trade, one second...
Don't worry I won't post the new ones, here's the one on this site for Nvidia where everyone said it wouldn't drop below $400 and wouldn't rebound to $480.
Anyone can wait for these trades, on low very low timeframes they come every day, on higher timeframes every quarter or year, but they are always there without exception, however there is the underlying problem, lack of confidence namely FOMO causing people to expose their capital when they shouldn't and not have capital or determination when they should, erasing profit opportunities back to basics, which comes back to education, back to lifestyle, it's a fun game of attrition which wealth and wisdom excel at and the rest don't, nothing more, nothing less.
