Based on the history of crashes it would seem very unlikely that such an area would be penetrated as we have already reached , in percentage terms , the same low levels as previous crashes. History repeats. I'm banking on it!
Based on the history of crashes it would seem very unlikely that such an area would be penetrated as we have already reached , in percentage terms , the same low levels as previous crashes. History repeats. I'm banking on it!
Historically, crashes have behaved pretty much the same way -- the thing that crashes loses about 75 percent of its value over time before recovering.
For instance, the Nasdaq peaked at about 5,000 just before the tech bubble burst in March 2000. It bottomed out two years later at about 1,200, having lost 75 percent of its value.
Does that mean that we're looking at the eventuality of Dow 4,000?
"Dow 4,000 would be an insane extreme, but this will get worse before it gets better," Hanson said. "I say that not with any fundamental evidence, but because the consensus seems to think that and they vote with their dollars in the market."