I'd imagine everyone on ET nailed it.
Yeah, seems that almost everyone shorted at the top at went long at the bottom.
;-)
I'd imagine everyone on ET nailed it.
Or also that a lot of traders "in the know" are too busy trading in the moment, and don't have time to be feeding their egos =pThere's only a few traders I trust on ST. The vast majority of it is dumb money and should be interpreted as such - particularly within the SPY stream where the majority is usually wrong.
In fact that sentiment indicator they have has been great for the expectation that there will indeed be a short squeeze.
What you'll find is that a lot of traders "in the know" keep it to themselves.
I'm curious as to how all the traders on this forum traded it. Did you expect this big of a reversal? Were you up/down for the day? Did you allow your mind to be opened enough for this reversal? Did you get in long at bottom and hold it all day? Or were you selling when market kept going higher??
On a side note, paper kept bidding it higher after the cash close. Interesting.
They'd be shorting it only if they:
* Ignored the multiple prior session's action leading up to this point (strength/basing).
* Ignored overly bearish sentiment and the fact that there's heaps of shorts for the market to punish at this point.
* Ignored the fact that it was forming a great rounding bottom and had tested 1883 multiple times with strength present.
* Actually believed that after it getting slayed by the NFP number it would just keep selling off in an obvious fashion even though the news (a typical shit-show circus) was out and done.
View attachment 157620
What are the names of the good ones? (PM me if you'd rather)
I went short ES before data covered 2 points off low. Then proceeded to short it at 1915, but in 2 lots as opposed to the 1 lot that I had for the initial short. Am still short the 2 lots. I will stay short I believe for a few days.
The funniest were the experts on CNBC. In the first 2 hours they were explaining why the job numbers caused this and that, and by the end of day, all those explanations were invalid...
The funniest were the experts on CNBC. In the first 2 hours they were explaining why the job numbers caused this and that, and by the end of day, all those explanations were invalid...