algo is for traders. not investors. and while each group thinks the other are 'nuts' investors make a lot more money than traders.
my fathers investment in a bank in 1994 was 100 000 bagger when I sold it 6 months back. yes 100 000 times his investment in 25 years
Very few US stocks have the low risk attributes right now of BMO and TD yet have a reasonable chance to go up 50% from Thursday's lows ( plus pay a 6% dividend ). And there is no doubt in my mind that they will revisit their ATHs at some point possibly much sooner then many people think. Americans might even profit as well from the sub 72 cent CDN$/US$ level that existed on Thursday am.
A generational opportunity is not based on past performance, it's a real time opportunity subject to existing market conditions. Your rant suggests you haven't done the work to understand exactly what occurred.
We may even see prices below those generational prices on Monday
I remember quite well last week you predicted 2850 is the bottom
Now those generational prices
Let's see what kind of bail outs bank get and how much shareholder value left after all said and done
thee is no question investing works. That being said if you bought japan bank in late 80, it would not.
let’s see who fares better this decade, traders or investors.
Why would you buy TD when you can buy QQQ?Depends on your goals and risk tolerance. The trade I recommended will do well regardless of the overall market conditions. There are very few trades as reliable as buying one of the top Canadian banks on any major correction. There are reasons for this; it's an oligopoly industry heavily supported by millions of Canadians who tend to be more risk adverse then Americans. For long term investors, someone buying TD in 1995 and reinvesting dividends was up something like 2500% in 2019.
Worst case they'll flat line and bore you but with a 5.5-7% dividend you get paid to wait ( over 6% on Thursday ).
Depends on your goals and risk tolerance. The trade I recommended will do well regardless of the overall market conditions. There are very few trades as reliable as buying one of the top Canadian banks on any major correction. There are reasons for this; it's an oligopoly industry heavily supported by millions of Canadians who tend to be more risk adverse then Americans. For long term investors, someone buying TD in 1995 and reinvesting dividends was up something like 2500% in 2019.
Worst case they'll flat line and bore you but with a 5.5-7% dividend you get paid to wait ( over 6% on Thursday ).
Look I share your thesis and I bought 25% in my retirement accounts of ZEB over Weds/Thurs. But with that said, who knows how this plays out.
I can tell you the chart went up for 25 years in Japan until 1990. Just saying.
Why would you buy TD when you can buy QQQ?
View attachment 222155
And from which source will old world banks garner earnings growth over and above say Technology stocks?TD has outperformed the QQQ by a large margin the last 25 years. This week was the ultimate buy the dip moment for the stock, lowest level since 2016. BMO even a better deal, lowest level since 2013. If the same occurred to some of the big US IT firms, people would be tripping over themselves to buy them.
BMO net income last quarter was $1.6B up from $1.2B the previous quarter.