HolyGrail - I suppose one could make a similar argument about most any technical indicator or chart pattern. Each has produced a probability of success and failure in the past.
Although I do not have hard statistics on the WW pattern, anecdotally, in my experience the WW pattern is valid and in the past has a produced reasonable success rate, certainly much higher than the 1 in 10 you mention.
On the EW .vs. WW comparison, the originator of the pattern is careful to point out WW has no direct relation or dependence on EW theory. There are no fib relationships or wave counting variants. With WW the market structure either forms the 5 overlapping waves or it doesn't. WW is a distinct structure, it does not attempt to fit or explain the broad myriad of market behavior.
Although I do not have hard statistics on the WW pattern, anecdotally, in my experience the WW pattern is valid and in the past has a produced reasonable success rate, certainly much higher than the 1 in 10 you mention.
On the EW .vs. WW comparison, the originator of the pattern is careful to point out WW has no direct relation or dependence on EW theory. There are no fib relationships or wave counting variants. With WW the market structure either forms the 5 overlapping waves or it doesn't. WW is a distinct structure, it does not attempt to fit or explain the broad myriad of market behavior.
.
). This flying pig fest almost makes me feel the moral obligation to short the market to help keep yet another asset bubble from forming
. If this thing goes up parabollically, I'll most likely lose a dozen grand or two and move on, but the likelihood of the emergence of financial catastrophe would grow.