I can see that technically we might still be in a downtrend, but that a market retracement to $30 would be quite realistic given how many better positioned shorts there are in the market.
Time and timeframes mean everything to me. Think of Market Profile and how the market defines a value area versus a rejected price. In this instance, if we spend some time above $30, the next target would be $50. If the market rejects $30 and breaks the recent Daily trendline upwards, then back down to $10 we would likely head. So, point being, price trend continuation, retracements, rejections, and price trend reversals are all time dependent. The longer the amount of time we spend at or better at a price level, the more ingrained becomes the market's acceptance of that price as fair value. In three months time, the price of $17 might seem ridiculously cheap to other market participants. Look at the bigger picture by looking at longer timeframes. My gift to you.
Having an opinion is fantastic provided that you confirm it with price action. You want to make sure that the market finally realizes how fucking brilliant you are. It takes dolts a while to catch up. And fighting them with a move 100 % or 200 % against you just sucks. Price is how we make and lose money.
Naturally, being a relative value kind of guy, I had to post this little gem as well. This tells me alot about how other participants compare RIMM's value to it's competitors and the broader tech market perhaps. This tells me that perhaps opinions are changing about RIMM's price valuation compared to industry peers. Or, if you don't agree with that, no doubt that there is a hell of alot of short covering going on and that paying $30 to cover a short initiated at $120 might be reasonable to some other lucky bastard. Like my Daddy always told me: "things are worth what people are willing to pay for them".