I was never compelled about valuation or the risk neutral. Here's something interesting.The difference between the n th squares 1 apart is 2n+1 so if you take sqrt(0.5(p^2- 1)-0.5(p^2+1)) for p prime you can get the solutions to pythagoras like 11^2 is 61^2-60^2 or 5^2,12+13 so pygathoras is really about the centre of p^2 and the 2 exponent relates to when you are going to cross. Obvious in retrospect. It is odd some of the binomial coefficients and how the number sets of size k has the set size 2 say or any subset of a fixed sized exactly the same frequency. So in a measure space you can have very different partitions can't you for your conditional expectation. Finally the probabability that a given given integer is an undecideable statement of the Godel type is order much bigger than the power set of those which can be shown to be true or false.
Dont fall for the “ compelling valuation “ nonsense
- Thread starter brightside
- Start date
.
^^^^^^ LOL, love it!!!
There is much further downside. Wage inflation !