Then the sample size is presumably low so difficult to ascertain if it's a real edge
Infrequent but present since the 1920s, therefore, plenty of samples to make an educated judgement on its expectancy.
Then the sample size is presumably low so difficult to ascertain if it's a real edge
Good for you then my man. Congrats. I couldn't figure out how to do that intraday. I saw one call from xspurt where he called a >100 pip move within 2 pips. But thAts the only time I've seen such accuracy.Infrequent but present since the 1920s, therefore, plenty of samples to make an educated judgement on its expectancy.
Good for you then my man. Congrats. I couldn't figure out how to do that intraday. I saw one call from xspurt where he called a >100 pip move within 2 pips. But thAts the only time I've seen such accuracy.

Ahhh. The connection lol.Oh Alan, good friend![]()
Had to laugh today when I read someone speaking about the viability of a controlled Martingale strategy-------------There is no such thing-----
1 point in the ES kinda accurate?I can't give the secret sauce away, but you don't need to average down when your entries are always extremely accurate (which they are once you know how to do it)
Stewie. I don't think he will be be disclosing this information. It's pretty much the secret sauce
I can't give the secret sauce away, but you don't need to average down when your entries are always extremely accurate (which they are once you know how to do it)
and once your entries are always extremely accurate (of course you need to know how to do it) there really is nothing more to do other than hire a good accountant to count your money
(it's all in the secret sauce (which I can't reveal))