Quote from Vaquero:
Wouldn't it be better if you were paying .001 per share...thus keeping 80% of the profits?
This is an example between a business model that is front end
oriented versus a back end model oriented model...
Hi Vaquero,
Your idea of a business model sounds like a good one at first blush, but I'd like to view it another way. As you've probably seen going through this thread, traders employing the Opening Strategy are probably making anywhere from 0.5 cents/share to 3.0 cents/share in a very good month. That's per share traded, not round turn, so the comparisons are direct and don't need to be multiplied by 2.
In a bad month, a .1 commission rate plus 20% split looks like a comparable commission charge of 0.2 cents (0.1 + 20% * 0.5 cents gross profit) a very nice proposition.
Now, say an average month gets a trader 1.5 cents per share. Now the comparable commission rate looks like 0.4 cents (done as above). This rate is getting fairly close to "industry standard."
Finally, a trader having a better month, at say 2.2 cents per share, is paying the equivalent of .54 cents in commission. OK, still workable.
So, to get back to your question, I think anyone making on average a gross of 1.5 cents per share on average (an average trade of 3.0 cents) would need some other inducement to move over.
Taken from your point of view, I assume, as a business owner, I'd ask a different question of you: Assuming rational "member traders" in a steady-state model will figure out the above for themselves, I'd expect your mature business to look like a mix of newer traders (for whom this is a good deal) and experienced traders making something like 1.0 cents per share on average. So, your overall cash flow model looks like any other prop firm doing business at a 0.4 cents rate. That's quite low. Especially if you are providing some "give ups" to your more experienced traders in exchange for trading and mentoring.
Can your business survive given that cash flow? Will you be cutting corners on software, connectivity, support, etc. to achieve this? At the very least, I'd expect these have to be run very lean. Will you be able to assure me that you are financially backed to avoid cash crunches, and adequately protected against "blow ups?"