There are many variables to the success of this strategy. These include:
1) the stocks (high or low volume, SPU correlation, beta/volatility, historical specialist behavior, etc.)
2) treatment of "news" (definition of news, include/exclude, wider envelopes in the event of news, etc.)
3) "envelope" quantity (is this a function of the prior day's cash close versus AM futures or a standard quantity such as 1%?)
4) envelope bias (if futures are up, then skew the envelopes to get less shorts or should the trader always use symmetrical envelopes?)
5) exit strategy (time based, trailing stops, use of automation, etc.)
With all of the above said (I have thought about this strategy quite a lot), the specific question I am initially interested in is about how you guys decide about what stocks to include or exclude. For what it is worth, I think my approach is unique:
* I statistically analyze specialist opening price correlations with the opening of the SPU's.
* Since the strength of the strategy is that it profits when stock prices revert to the "correct" price (in consideration of prior close, beta, SPU fair value, etc.), what I focus on are stocks that have both a high and stable correlation to the SPUs on a close to open basis. If this correlation is high and stable, then the reversion tendency is likely to be highest.... this is what my research tells me.
For those who know me, I am a "quant" but I submit to those who have more extensive experience than I with this strategy.
Thanks for your input on any of the above topics.
Sharif
1) the stocks (high or low volume, SPU correlation, beta/volatility, historical specialist behavior, etc.)
2) treatment of "news" (definition of news, include/exclude, wider envelopes in the event of news, etc.)
3) "envelope" quantity (is this a function of the prior day's cash close versus AM futures or a standard quantity such as 1%?)
4) envelope bias (if futures are up, then skew the envelopes to get less shorts or should the trader always use symmetrical envelopes?)
5) exit strategy (time based, trailing stops, use of automation, etc.)
With all of the above said (I have thought about this strategy quite a lot), the specific question I am initially interested in is about how you guys decide about what stocks to include or exclude. For what it is worth, I think my approach is unique:
* I statistically analyze specialist opening price correlations with the opening of the SPU's.
* Since the strength of the strategy is that it profits when stock prices revert to the "correct" price (in consideration of prior close, beta, SPU fair value, etc.), what I focus on are stocks that have both a high and stable correlation to the SPUs on a close to open basis. If this correlation is high and stable, then the reversion tendency is likely to be highest.... this is what my research tells me.
For those who know me, I am a "quant" but I submit to those who have more extensive experience than I with this strategy.
Thanks for your input on any of the above topics.
Sharif